Skip to main content
iRubric: ARCH40521 and ARCH60521 Project rubric

iRubric: ARCH40521 and ARCH60521 Project rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ARCH40521 and ARCH60521 Project 
Rubric Code: Y22WA58
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Memo
  Maximum Points

5 pts

Closer to Maximum Than Minimum

4 pts

Closer to Minimum Than Maximum

3 pts

Minimum Requirements

2 pts

Missing

0 pts

Project Introduction

Maximum Points

Provide clear, concise and complete introduction to project and description of selected building.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Provide unclear and incomplete introduction to project and description of selected building.
Missing
Description of Slab System

Maximum Points

Provided clear and complete description of structural slab system.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Provided unclear and incomplete description of structural slab system.
Missing
Rational for Slab System

Maximum Points

Provided logical reason(s) for selection of structural system.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Provided incorrect or unimportant reason(s) for selection of structural system.
Missing
Use of PCA Figure #2

Maximum Points

Clear annotations and markings to demonstrate the use of Figure #2 in the PCA document.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Unclear and insufficient annotations and markings to demonstrate the use of Figure #2 in the PCA document.
Missing
Memo
  Maximum Points

10 pts

Closer to Maximum Than Minimum

8 pts

Closer to Minimum Than Maximum

6 pts

Minimum Requirements

4 pts

Missing

0 pts

Discussion of Design Change

Maximum Points

Complete, clear and concise discussion of how the architectural design would change if a different slab system was selected, including the impact on relative cost and structural layout.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Incomplete and unclear discussion of how the architectural design would change if a different slab system was selected.
Missing
Writing Quality

Maximum Points

Cohesive memo with clear grammar and formatting.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Memo has several grammar and formatting errors.
Missing
Drawings
  Maximum Points

20 pts

Closer to Maximum Than Minimum

17 pts

Closer to Minimum Than Maximum

14 pts

Minimum Requirements

12 pts

Missing

0 pts

Labels and Dimensions

Maximum Points

Included all relevant structural information such as appropriate dimensions and labels
for all structural elements.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Did not included all relevant structural information such as appropriate dimensions and labels for all structural elements.
Missing
Drawings
  Maximum Points

5 pts

Closer to Maximum Than Minimum

4 pts

Closer to Minimum Than Maximum

3 pts

Minimum Requirements

2 pts

Missing

0 pts

Partition Walls

Maximum Points

All partition walls (i.e., non-bearing walls) are clearly identified.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

All partition walls (i.e., non-bearing walls) are not clearly identified.
Missing
Title Block

Maximum Points

Included all appropriate information within a title block.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Missing some relevant information within title block.
Missing
Drawings
  Maximum Points

10 pts

Closer to Maximum Than Minimum

8 pts

Closer to Minimum Than Maximum

6 pts

Minimum Requirements

4 pts

Missing

0 pts

Logical and Redundant Design

Maximum Points

Logical and redundant structural layout for one typical floor using a concrete slab system.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Structural layout lacks redundancy, proper structural support, and/or load paths are not clear.
Missing
Column and Bearing Walls

Maximum Points

All bearing walls and columns are clearly identified.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Bearing walls and columns are not all clearly identified.
Missing
Presentation Quality

Maximum Points

Drawing presentation was professional, complete, organized, and neatly drawn.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements

Drawing presentation was not professional, complete, organized, and/or neatly drawn.
Missing

Note: Point deduction for late submissions included within this category.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178