Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
User's Guide
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ARCH40521 and ARCH60521 Project rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ARCH40521 and ARCH60521 Project
ARCH40511 and ARCH70531 Project
Rubric Code:
Y22WA58
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Memo
Descriptions
Maximum Points
5 pts
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
4 pts
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
3 pts
Minimum Requirements
2 pts
Missing
0 pts
Project Introduction
Maximum Points
Provide clear, concise and complete introduction to project and description of selected building.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Provide unclear and incomplete introduction to project and description of selected building.
Missing
Description of Slab System
Maximum Points
Provided clear and complete description of structural slab system.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Provided unclear and incomplete description of structural slab system.
Missing
Rational for Slab System
Maximum Points
Provided logical reason(s) for selection of structural system.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Provided incorrect or unimportant reason(s) for selection of structural system.
Missing
Use of PCA Figure #2
Maximum Points
Clear annotations and markings to demonstrate the use of Figure #2 in the PCA document.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Unclear and insufficient annotations and markings to demonstrate the use of Figure #2 in the PCA document.
Missing
Memo
Maximum Points
10 pts
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
8 pts
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
6 pts
Minimum Requirements
4 pts
Missing
0 pts
Discussion of Design Change
Maximum Points
Complete, clear and concise discussion of how the architectural design would change if a different slab system was selected, including the impact on relative cost and structural layout.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Incomplete and unclear discussion of how the architectural design would change if a different slab system was selected.
Missing
Writing Quality
Maximum Points
Cohesive memo with clear grammar and formatting.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Memo has several grammar and formatting errors.
Missing
Drawings
Maximum Points
20 pts
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
17 pts
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
14 pts
Minimum Requirements
12 pts
Missing
0 pts
Labels and Dimensions
Maximum Points
Included all relevant structural information such as appropriate dimensions and labels
for all structural elements.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Did not included all relevant structural information such as appropriate dimensions and labels for all structural elements.
Missing
Drawings
Maximum Points
5 pts
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
4 pts
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
3 pts
Minimum Requirements
2 pts
Missing
0 pts
Partition Walls
Maximum Points
All partition walls (i.e., non-bearing walls) are clearly identified.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
All partition walls (i.e., non-bearing walls) are not clearly identified.
Missing
Title Block
Maximum Points
Included all appropriate information within a title block.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Missing some relevant information within title block.
Missing
Drawings
Maximum Points
10 pts
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
8 pts
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
6 pts
Minimum Requirements
4 pts
Missing
0 pts
Logical and Redundant Design
Maximum Points
Logical and redundant structural layout for one typical floor using a concrete slab system.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Structural layout lacks redundancy, proper structural support, and/or load paths are not clear.
Missing
Column and Bearing Walls
Maximum Points
All bearing walls and columns are clearly identified.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Bearing walls and columns are not all clearly identified.
Missing
Presentation Quality
Maximum Points
Drawing presentation was professional, complete, organized, and neatly drawn.
Closer to Maximum Than Minimum
Closer to Minimum Than Maximum
Minimum Requirements
Drawing presentation was not professional, complete, organized, and/or neatly drawn.
Missing
Note: Point deduction for late submissions included within this category.
Subjects:
Engineering
Education
(General)
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.