iRubric: U3 peer review drafts and responses rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
U3 peer review drafts and responses Project 2 Drafts and Peer Reviews Rubric Code: WXB72A2 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

U3 Draft Documents & Peer Review Descriptions
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Developing 2.5 pts	Acceptable 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Completed Letter by the Deadline	Unacceptable Not submitted.	Developing This is an incomplete submission with too little for peer reviewers to respond to or submission does not clearly respond to the assignment prompt. Peer reviewers confused by submission.	Acceptable Letter draft submitted met the minimum requirements.	Excellent Full-length letter that responded to the assignment prompt thoughtfully, thoroughly, and by deadline.
Completed Rhetorical Profile	Unacceptable Not submitted.	Developing This is an incomplete rhetorical situation profile with too little to guide peer reviewers.	Acceptable Rhetorical situation profile draft may not have been submitted by deadline, but ultimately met the minimum requirements.	Excellent Rhetorical situation profile completed thoughtfully, thoroughly, and by deadline.
One Thorough Peer Review	Unacceptable Not submitted.	Developing Peer review lacks usable and concrete revision suggestions.	Acceptable Peer review answers all required questions, but some answers to questions may lack specific or concrete recommendations the writer can use. The formatting of the peer answers may be confusing and hard to distinguish from the directive questions.	Excellent Helpful peer review that offers substantive and immediately useful suggestions for revision. Follows Q&A formatting requirement.
Second Thorough Peer Review	Unacceptable Not submitted.	Developing Peer review lacks usable and concrete revision suggestions.	Acceptable Peer review answers all required questions, but some answers to questions may lack specific or concrete recommendations the writer can use. The formatting of the peer answers may be confusing and hard to distinguish from the directive questions.	Excellent Helpful peer review that offers substantive and immediately useful suggestions for revision. Follows Q&A formatting requirement.