iRubric: Movie Reflection rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Movie Reflection Paper 1 Rubric Code: VX88377 Ready to use Public Rubric Locked Rubric Subject: Philosophy Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Key Concepts and Analysis Descriptions 70 points (70%)
	Mastery 70–63 points (100–90%) 70 pts	Proficient 62–56 points (89–80%) 62 pts	Competent 55–49 points (79–70%) 55 pts	Developing 48–42 points (69–60%) 48 pts	Poor < 42 points (< 60%) 42 pts
Key Concepts and Analysis	Mastery Student uses key terms and ideas from class to analyze ethical tensions within the film. Accounts for all the major relevant ethical themes present in the chosen scene. Relevant details are described and explained.	Proficient Student uses key concepts from class, but occasionally misses an important idea, or misuses concepts in their analysis. Relevant details are highlighted, but some are missing o left unanalyzed.	Competent Multiple key concepts addressed by the scene are missing from analysis, or analysis is not sufficiently developed to demonstrate student’s understanding of the concepts.	Developing Few if any key concepts from class used in analysis that only summarizes the movie. Student does not demonstrate original thought or application of ethical concepts to the chosen scene.	Poor Key concepts are completely missing, or student demonstrates a clear misunderstanding of the terms. Analysis does not reflect or develop ethical tensions in the movie.
Writing 30 points (30%)
	Mastery 30–27 points (100–90%) 30 pts	Proficient 26–24 points (89–80%) 26 pts	Competent 23–21 points (79–70%) 23 pts	Developing 20–18 points (69–60%) 20 pts	Poor < 18 points (< 60%) 18 pts
Writing	Mastery Almost entirely free of punctuation and grammatical errors.. Ideas flow from one another, guiding reader through the essay.	Proficient A few minor punctuation or grammatical errors. Each paragraph relates furthers the analysis, but links between ideas may not be fully developed.	Competent Several punctuation and grammatical errors. Some ideas are out of place or random, paragraphs relate to main analysis but not to surrounding paragraphs.	Developing Punctuation and grammatical errors affect meaning or readability. Ideas are random and scattered. Transitions are missing. Some paragraphs do not link to paper’s analysis.	Poor Major punctuation or grammatical errors that affect meaning. Paper is difficult to read, and analysis and paragraphs lack relation to each other.