Skip to main content

University of Notre Dame

iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: DM: Project 1 Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
DM: Project 1 Presentation Rubric Code: V2WW55A Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title Descriptions
	Did not complete 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Competent 2 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Advanced 4 pts
Slide Construction	Did not complete	Poor The slides do not contain all of the required components and fail in 3-4 of the following categories: clear and organized; fonts are well sized; figures/images are easy to read; good balance between images and text; appealing to the audience; appropriate length given duration of presentation.	Competent The slides do not contain all of the required components or fail in 3-4 of the following categories: clear and organized; fonts are well sized; figures/images are easy to read; good balance between images and text; appealing to the audience; appropriate length given duration of presentation.	Proficient The slides fail in 1-2 of the following categories: clear and organized; fonts are well sized; figures/images are easy to read; good balance between images and text; appealing to the audience; appropriate length given duration of presentation.	Advanced The slides fail in none of the following categories: clear and organized; fonts are well sized; figures/images are easy to read; good balance between images and text; appealing to the audience; appropriate length given duration of presentation.
Presentation of Material	Did not complete	Poor The presentation of the material did not clearly articulate the concept development process and was also weak in one or more of the following areas: was eloquent with a clear narrative and fluidity; complemented and was enhanced by the slides; was engaging to the audience, leaving only in depth questions	Competent The presentation of the material did not clearly articulate the concept development process but was generally strong in the following areas: was eloquent with a clear narrative and fluidity; complemented and was enhanced by the slides; was engaging to the audience, leaving only in depth questions	Proficient The presentation of the material clearly articulated the concept development process but weak in one or more of the following areas: was eloquent with a clear narrative and fluidity; complemented and was enhanced by the slides; was engaging to the audience, leaving only in depth questions	Advanced The presentation of the material clearly articulated the concept development process and also strong in the following areas: was eloquent with a clear narrative and fluidity; complemented and was enhanced by the slides; was engaging to the audience, leaving only in depth questions

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202