iRubric: SMCP s15 Paper 1 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
SMCP s15 Paper 1 Rubric Code: UX26923 By amische Ready to use Private Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

PAPER 1 RUBRIC Descriptions Enter rubric description
	Good 1 pts	Fair 0.5 pts	Poor 0 pts
Introduction
Previews case and concepts 1 pts Enter description	Good Provides a lively and engaging preview of the case AND a preview of all of the concepts that will be discussed in the paper.	Fair Gives a quick, cursory and not very engaging preview of the case AND/OR an incomplete preview of upcoming concepts.	Poor Lacking one or both of the required preview elements (case or concepts).
Clearly states argument 1 pts	Good Makes a clear and compelling statement of an original and interesting argument.	Fair Provides a summary statement that mechanically sums up paper without providing a compelling argument.	Poor Lacks an argument or thesis statement.
Question 1 Why did the movement emerge?
Clearly answers question 1 pts	Good Clearly addresses the question and offers a fully developed and well argued answer.	Fair Addresses the question, but answer is not well developed or confusing.	Poor Doesn't answer the question
Clearly defines concepts 1 pts	Good Gives a clear and thorough definition that draws on relevant terminology and explains associated sub-concepts.	Fair Defines concepts, but in a sketchy, unclear or misleading way.	Poor Doesn't definite concept
Applies concepts to case 1 pts examples.	Good Gives detailed account of how concepts apply to cases, with specific examples. Examples demonstrate a clear understanding of the concept.	Fair Application of concepts to the case is sketchy, confusing, or misleading in some way.	Poor Doesn't explain how concepts apply to case.
Question 2 How did the movement mobilize?
Clearly answers question 1 pts	Good Clearly addresses the question and offers a fully developed and well argued answer.	Fair Addresses the question, but answer is not well developed or confusing.	Poor Doesn't answer the question
Clearly defintes concept 1 pts	Good Gives a clear and thorough definition that draws on relevant terminology and explains associated sub-concepts.	Fair Defines concepts, but in a sketchy, unclear or misleading way.	Poor Doesn't definite concept
Applies concepts to case 1 pts	Good Gives detailed account of how concepts apply to cases, with specific examples. Examples demonstrate a clear understanding of the concept.	Fair Application of concepts to the case is sketchy, confusing, or misleading in some way.	Poor Doesn't explain how concepts apply to case.
Question 3 What did the protests mean to the participants?
Clearly answers question 1 pts	Good Clearly addresses the question and offers a fully developed and well argued answer.	Fair Addresses the question, but answer is not well developed or confusing.	Poor Doesn't answer the question
Clearly defines concepts 1 pts	Good Gives a clear and thorough definition that draws on relevant terminology and explains associated sub-concepts.	Fair Defines concepts, but in a sketchy, unclear or misleading way.	Poor Doesn't definite concept
Applies concepts to case 1 pts	Good Gives detailed account of how concepts apply to cases, with specific examples. Examples demonstrate a clear understanding of the concept.	Fair Application of concepts to the case is sketchy, confusing, or misleading in some way.	Poor Doesn't explain how concepts apply to case.
Conclusion
Recaps main points 1 pts	Good Goes over the main points of the argument, including a recap of the concepts.	Fair Restates main point in a general and vague way.	Poor No conclusion
Poses further questions 1 pts	Good Poses challenging, original questions raised by the analysis.	Fair Poses quick, vague questions that doesn't go beneath the surface	Poor No conclusion
Writing
Writes grammatically 1 pts	Good Sentences are consistently grammatical, with hardly any errors throughout.	Fair Occasional grammatical errors, such as run-ons, fragment sentences, subject-verb agreement, pronoun agreement, verb tense, commas, punctuation, spelling.	Poor Serious and consistent problems in grammar, punctuation and/or spelling. NEXT PAPER MUST BE TAKEN TO THE WRITING CENTER BEFORE SUBMISSION.
Writes clearly and fluently 1 pts	Good Sentences are clear, graceful and fluid. A pleasure to read.	Fair Occasional awkward spots, rough writing or confusing word choice. Sometime hard to concentrate on ideas.	Poor Consistently rough and choppy writing. Difficult and frustrating to read. NEXT PAPER MUST BE TAKEN TO THE WRITING CENTER BEFORE SUBMISSION.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric