Skip to main content

University of Notre Dame

iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Lease Case 2021 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Lease Case 2021 Lease Case 2020 This rubric is used for a PowerPoint deck that requires students to research the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The rubric considers organization, identification of issues, application of the appropriate literature, analysis, and conclusion. Rubric Code: U224834 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Accounting Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

ACCT 30120 Spring 2021 Descriptions
	Excellent 1 pts	Good 0.85 pts	Average 0.75 pts	Below average 0.6 pts
Form 10 pts	Excellent The document follows the file naming, title slide, number of slides, overcrowding, and slide numbering requirements.	Good The document follows most of the file naming, title slide, number of slides, overcrowding, and slide numbering requirements.	Average Several form requirements are missing.	Below average Most form requirements are missing.
Organization 10 pts	Excellent The deck appears neat & organized; logical; no spelling or grammar errors; guides the reader through the case; integrates calculations and tables into slides; citations use appropriate form.	Good Generally logical but occasionally skips around; few lapses in grammar or spelling; generally guides the reader; integrates calculations and tables into slides; most citations use appropriate form.	Average Skips around, but addresses all the points; occasional lapses in grammar and or spelling; reader must work to follow the train of thought; integrates calculations and tables into slides; citations do not use appropriate form.	Below average Haphazard; difficult to follow; several grammar and or spelling errors; generally sloppy in appearance; does not integrate calculations and tables into slides; citations do not use appropriate form.
Issues 10 pts	Excellent Identifies the appropriate key issues; identifies any implied issues; goes beyond the minimums asked in the case	Good Identifies most key issues and some implied issues; handles the minimum requirements well and recognizes some issues beyond them	Average identifies some key issues but does not recognize implied issues; does not go beyond the minimum requirements of the case	Below average Does not recognize the key issues of the case; does not understand the questions being asked and/or the accounting questions being posed
Applicable Literature 10 pts	Excellent Identifies all applicable literature; does not include extraneous material; links the relationship between the selected literature and the issues at hand; recognizes nuances and subtle relationships between literature and issues	Good Identifies most of the applicable literature; includes some extraneous material; generally connects the issues to the literature identified but misses the subtle points	Average Identifies some of the appropriate literature but includes much that is not on point; does not connect appropriate literature to all the identified issues	Below average Appears to be reaching for anything no matter how remotely related; clips large sections of material and pastes it into the memo in hope that the reader may find some connection; references included are generally irrelevant
Analysis 10 pts	Excellent Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature	Good Generally analyzes all the issues in light of the literature identified, but does not connect in some areas; arguments are not always persuasive and leave some work to the reader to connect the dots	Average Analysis is superficial; treats some issues as "given" when a challenging analysis is required; arguments are not well supported; arguments are one-sided and do not address alternatives	Below average Appears lost; does not understand the issues sufficiently to be able to connect them to the literature and evaluate them; does not understand the case
Application of analysis 10 pts	Excellent All positions/calculations/journal entries follow clearly from the analysis and are fully supported.	Good Positions generally follow from the analysis but support is not fully integrated. Most calculations and journal entries are accurate.	Average The applications follow from the analysis, but not clearly; positions are "hedged" with new issues or alternatives not previously discussed. The majority of calculations and journal entries (when part of the case) are accurate.	Below average Positions are unsupported or do not follow logically from the analysis. The majority of calculations and journal entries (when part of the case) are inaccurate.
Conclusion 5 pts	Excellent Slides contain a conclusion that clearly identifies recommended solution and key reasons.	Good Slides contain a conclusion but key findings or reasoning is not clear.	Average Slides contain a conclusion but key findings or reasoning are missing.	Below average Conclusion is missing.

Keywords:

Case Memorandum Trueblood

Subjects:

Accounting

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Accounting rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202