Skip to main content

University of Notre Dame

iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020 Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020 Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020 --section 3 --Ayers Rubric Code: T2XAW7C Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Accounting Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Group Case Submission Descriptions
	Category 1 1 pts	Category 2 0.85 pts	Category 3 0.7 pts	Category 4 0.5 pts	Category 5 0 pts
Organization 30 pts	Category 1 Guides the reader completely and concisely; appears neat & organized; logical; no spelling or grammar errors; uses active voice; gets to the point.	Category 2 Generally guides the reader but occasionally skips around; few lapses in grammar or spelling.	Category 3 Addresses all points but skips around; occasional lapses in grammar and or spelling; reader must work to follow the train of thought	Category 4 Generally difficult to follow; several grammar and or spelling errors; generally sloppy in appearance	Category 5 No credit
Facts 5 pts	Category 1 Refers to the facts of the case (provided in the assignment)	Category 2	Category 3	Category 4	Category 5 No credit
Issues 18 pts	Category 1 Identifies the appropriate key issues; identifies any implied issues; goes beyond the minimums asked in the case	Category 2 Identifies most key issues and some implied issues; handles the minimum requirements well and recognizes some issues beyond them	Category 3 Identifies some key issues but does not recognize implied issues; does not go beyond the minimum requirements of the case	Category 4 Does not recognize the key issues of the case; does not understand the questions being asked and/or the accounting questions being posed	Category 5 No credit
Applicable Literature 22 pts	Category 1 Identifies all applicable literature; does not include extraneous material; demonstrates the relationship between the selected literature and the issues at hand; recognizes nuances and subtle relationships between literature and issues	Category 2 Identifies most of the applicable literature; missing some applicable literature or includes some extraneous material; generally connects the issues to the literature identified but misses the subtle points	Category 3 Identifies some of the appropriate literature but includes much that is not on point or misses important parts of the literature; does not connect appropriate literature to all the identified issues	Category 4 Missing important applicable literature; includes irrelevant references; clips large sections of material and pastes it into the memo in hope that the reader may find some connection	Category 5 No credit
Discussion & Analysis 34 pts	Category 1 Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature; clearly addresses alternatives	Category 2 Generally analyzes all the issues in light of the literature identified; arguments are not always persuasive and leave some work to the reader to connect the dots; acknowledges alternatives but does not clearly address them	Category 3 Arguments are generally one-sided and do not address alternatives; analysis treats some issues as "given" when a challenging analysis is required; arguments are not well supported in light of the applicable literature	Category 4 Analysis does not sufficiently connect the literature to the issues; does not guide the reader though the case to the conclusion(s) reached	Category 5 No credit
Conclusion 16 pts	Category 1 Conclusion follows clearly from the analysis; it is logical and supported; there is no hedging and no part of the conclusion is unsupported	Category 2 Conclusions generally follow from the analysis but support is not fully integrated into the conclusion; leaves some work to the reader; offers some unsupported conclusions	Category 3 Some conclusions follow from the analysis, but not clearly; conclusions are "hedged" with new issues or alternatives not previously discussed	Category 4 Conclusions are unsupported; they do not follow logically from the analysis	Category 5 No credit

Keywords:

Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020 --section 3 --Ayers

Subjects:

Accounting

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Accounting rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n220