Skip to main content
iRubric: Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020

iRubric: Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020 
Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020
Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020 --section 3 --Ayers
Rubric Code: T2XAW7C
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Accounting  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Group Case Submission
  Category 1

1 pts

Category 2

0.85 pts

Category 3

0.7 pts

Category 4

0.5 pts

Category 5

0 pts

Organization
30 pts

Category 1

Guides the reader completely and concisely; appears neat & organized; logical; no spelling or grammar errors; uses active voice; gets to the point.
Category 2

Generally guides the reader but occasionally skips around; few lapses in grammar or spelling.
Category 3

Addresses all points but skips around; occasional lapses in grammar and or spelling; reader must work to follow the train of thought
Category 4

Generally difficult to follow; several grammar and or spelling errors; generally sloppy in appearance
Category 5

No credit
Facts
5 pts

Category 1

Refers to the facts of the case (provided in the assignment)
Category 2
Category 3
Category 4
Category 5

No credit
Issues
18 pts

Category 1

Identifies the appropriate key issues; identifies any implied issues; goes beyond the minimums asked in the case
Category 2

Identifies most key issues and some implied issues; handles the minimum requirements well and recognizes some issues beyond them
Category 3

Identifies some key issues but does not recognize implied issues; does not go beyond the minimum requirements of the case
Category 4

Does not recognize the key issues of the case; does not understand the questions being asked and/or the accounting questions being posed
Category 5

No credit
Applicable Literature
22 pts

Category 1

Identifies all applicable literature; does not include extraneous material; demonstrates the relationship between the selected literature and the issues at hand; recognizes nuances and subtle relationships between literature and issues
Category 2

Identifies most of the applicable literature; missing some applicable literature or includes some extraneous material; generally connects the issues to the literature identified but misses the subtle points
Category 3

Identifies some of the appropriate literature but includes much that is not on point or misses important parts of the literature; does not connect appropriate literature to all the identified issues
Category 4

Missing important applicable literature; includes irrelevant references; clips large sections of material and pastes it into the memo in hope that the reader may find some connection
Category 5

No credit
Discussion & Analysis
34 pts

Category 1

Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature; clearly addresses alternatives
Category 2

Generally analyzes all the issues in light of the literature identified; arguments are not always persuasive and leave some work to the reader to connect the dots; acknowledges alternatives but does not clearly address them
Category 3

Arguments are generally one-sided and do not address alternatives; analysis treats some issues as "given" when a challenging analysis is required; arguments are not well supported in light of the applicable literature
Category 4

Analysis does not sufficiently connect the literature to the issues; does not guide the reader though the case to the conclusion(s) reached
Category 5

No credit
Conclusion
16 pts

Category 1

Conclusion follows clearly from the analysis; it is logical and supported; there is no hedging and no part of the conclusion is unsupported
Category 2

Conclusions generally follow from the analysis but support is not fully integrated into the conclusion; leaves some work to the reader; offers some unsupported conclusions
Category 3

Some conclusions follow from the analysis, but not clearly; conclusions are "hedged" with new issues or alternatives not previously discussed
Category 4

Conclusions are unsupported; they do not follow logically from the analysis
Category 5

No credit



Keywords:
  • Individual Case Rubric ACCT 30110 Fall 2020 --section 3 --Ayers

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178