Skip to main content
iRubric: 40520/70521 Group Assignments Fall2020 rubric

iRubric: 40520/70521 Group Assignments Fall2020 rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
40520/70521 Group Assignments Fall2020 
40520 Group project Assignments Fall2019
This rubric is used for written deliverable that requires graduate or advanced auditing students to read a case, work in a group and prepare a group or individual deliverable based on the case prompts. The rubric considers organization, identification of issues, application of the appropriate literature, analysis, and conclusion.
Rubric Code: T2X7X98
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Accounting  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric ACCT 40520 Fall 2019
  Exceptional

1 pts

Significantly Exceeds Expectations

0.96 pts

Exceeds Expectations

0.92 pts

Exceeds Some Expectations

0.88 pts

Meets All Expectations

0.84 pts

Meets Most Exceptions

0.8 pts

Meets Some Expectations

0.75 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

0.65 pts

Organization
4 pts

Exceptional

Appears exceptionally neat & organized; logical; no spelling or grammar errors; uses active voice; guides the reader through the case; clear & concisel
Significantly Exceeds Expectations

Appears neat & organized; logical; no spelling or grammar errors; uses active voice; guides the reader through the case; gets to the point.
Exceeds Expectations

Appears mostly neat & organized; logical; no or one spelling or grammar error(s); generally uses active voice; generally guides the reader through the case; mostly gets to the point.
Exceeds Some Expectations

Appears generally neat & organized; logical; no or few spelling or grammar error(s); generally uses active voice; generally guides the reader through the case; mostly gets to the point.
Meets All Expectations

Generally logical but occasionally skips around; few lapses in grammar or spelling; generally guides the reader; mostly gets to the point.
Meets Most Exceptions

Skips around, but addresses all the points; occasional lapses in grammar and or spelling; reader must work to follow the train of thought
Meets Some Expectations

Skips around, but addresses most of the points; occasional lapses in grammar and or spelling; reader must work to follow the train of thought
Does Not Meet Expectations

Haphazard; difficult to follow; several grammar and or spelling errors; generally sloppy in appearance
Facts & Issues
3 pts

Exceptional

Summarizes all of the facts completely; all key facts identified; clearly distinguishes between facts and assumptions. Identifies all of the appropriate key issues; identifies all implied issues, if any; goes well beyond the minimums asked in the case
Significantly Exceeds Expectations

Summarizes most of the facts completely; most key facts identified; distinguishes between facts and assumptions. Identifies most of the appropriate issues; identifies most implied issues, if any; goes beyond the minimums asked in the case
Exceeds Expectations

Summarizes most or some of the facts completely; most or some key facts identified; distinguishes between facts and assumptions. Identifies most or some of the appropriate issues; identifies most or some implied issues, if any; goes beyond the minimums asked in the case
Exceeds Some Expectations

Summarizes some of the facts completely; some key facts identified; distinguishes between facts and assumptions. Identifies some of the appropriate issues; identifies some implied issues, if any; goes beyond the minimums asked in the case
Meets All Expectations

Demonstrates an understanding of the facts; some key facts identified; distinguishes between facts and assumptions. Identifies key issues and implied issues; handles the minimum requirements well and recognizes issues beyond them
Meets Most Exceptions

Generally understands the facts; does not distinguish between facts and assumptions. Identifies some key issues and implied issues; handles the minimum requirements and recognizes some issues beyond them
Meets Some Expectations

Generally understands the facts; does not distinguish between facts and assumptions. identifies some key issues but does not recognize implied issues; does not go beyond the minimum requirements of the case
Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not recognize the facts of the case and does not demonstrate an understanding of them; challenges nothing. Does not recognize the key issues of the case; does not understand the questions being asked and/or the accounting questions being posed
Discussion & Analysis
10 pts

Exceptional

Presents an exceptionally insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents exceptionally persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature
Significantly Exceeds Expectations

Presents an significantly exceeding insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents significantly exceeding persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature
Exceeds Expectations

Presents an exceeding exceptions level of an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents an exceeding expectations
level of persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature
Exceeds Some Expectations

Presents some exceeding exceptions level of an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents some exceeding expectations
level of persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature
Meets All Expectations

Analyzes all the issues in light of the literature identified, but does not connect in some areas; arguments are not always persuasive and leave some work to the reader to connect the dots
Meets Most Exceptions

Analyzes most the issues in light of the literature identified, but does not connect in some areas; arguments are not always persuasive and leave some work to the reader to connect the dots
Meets Some Expectations

Analyzes some of the issues in light of the literature identified, but does not connect in some areas; arguments are not always persuasive and leave some work to the reader to connect the dots
Does Not Meet Expectations

Appears lost; does not understand the issues sufficiently to be able to connect them to the literature and evaluate them; does not understand the case
Conclusion
3 pts

Exceptional

Conclusion exceptionally clear from the analysis; conclusion is logical and fully supported; there is no hedging and provides clear and concise understanding to the reader
Significantly Exceeds Expectations

Conclusion follows clearly from the analysis; conclusion is logical and supported; there is no hedging and no part of the conclusion is unsupported
Exceeds Expectations

Conclusion generally follows clearly from the analysis; conclusion is logical and supported; there is no hedging and no part of the conclusion is unsupported
Exceeds Some Expectations

Conclusion generally follows from the analysis, but reader must do some work; conclusion is logical and supported; some hedging or part of the conclusion is unsupported
Meets All Expectations

Conclusions follow from the analysis but support is not fully integrated into the conclusion; leaves some work to the reader; offers some unsupported conclusions
Meets Most Exceptions

Conclusions generally follow from the analysis but support is not fully integrated into the conclusion; leaves some work to the reader; offers some unsupported conclusions
Meets Some Expectations

Some conclusions follow from the analysis, but not clearly; conclusions are "hedged" with new issues or alternatives not previously discussed
Does Not Meet Expectations

Conclusions are unsupported; they do not follow logically from the analysis



Keywords:
  • Case Group Technical Memorandum

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178