Criterion is exceptionally well developed.
4 pts
Criterion is present and capably executed
3 pts
Criterion is there but insufficiently developed or unclerar
2 pts
Criterion is missing from the paper
1 pts
Is there a clear thesis statement in the introductory paragraph? Is the question, issue or approach adequately introduced for the non-expert reader?
Does the body of the paper address all of the relevant points asked for in the assignment?
Does the body of the paper progress logically from one point to the next? 1 description
Are paragraph transitions helpful in leading the reader through the exposition of the thesis of the paper?
Are the theorist’s major ideas properly cited (author, date: page #)?
Do any examples adequately illustrate the concepts being discussed?
Are problems/weaknesses in the theorist’s argument discussed? Are criticisms clearly explained and defended?
Does the concluding paragraph of the paper summarize the lessons learned? Does it present further questions and/or implications of the paper's arguments?
Are sentences clear, fluent, and graceful to read? i Does the paper have a strong, personal voice, with active, engaging prose?
Are sentences consistently grammatical and free of typos or errors?
1.5 pts
0.5 pts
Is the concept clearly summarized and explained? Does it link well to the example and argument in the paper?