Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
User's Guide
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: VCD 03 | Project 3 – Portfolio rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
VCD 03 | Project 3 – Portfolio
VCD 03 | Project 2 – Game/Learning Tool
What is a rubric? A rubric explains the criteria I use in assigning grades and serves as a guide to help you as you complete your projects. What constitutes “A” work? I have not specified what constitutes an “A” to help you focus on doing the best work that you can with out being preoccupied by whether or not you’ve done just enough to get the right letter grade. Design is a creative endeavor. Consequently, doing well depends on more than just fulfilling the bare minimum assignment requirements.
Rubric Code:
SXB8AX6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project 3: Responsive Portfolio
Descriptions
Exceptional | A+ range
4 pts
Very Good | B+ range
3.56 pts
Acceptable | C range
3.04 pts
Unacceptable | F range
2.36 pts
Content
3 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Demonstrates clear understanding of assignment
Follows instructions as specified on assignment sheet
Acceptable | C range
Demonstrates basic understanding of assignment
Generally follows instructions
Unacceptable | F range
Demonstrates vague understanding of assignment
Fails to follow instructions
Part 1: Research
4 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Research notes and analysis is provided and covers 5 or more portfolio sites.
Acceptable | C range
Research notes and analysis is provided but only covers 3–4 portfolio sites.
Unacceptable | F range
Research notes and analysis is provided and covers 2 or fewer portfolio sites.
Part 2: Sketching
6 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Demonstrates ability to generate a variety of ideas and concepts
Demonstrates ability to get ideas down on paper
Wireframe sketches successfully convey more than 5 content types and groupings
Acceptable | C range
Demonstrates ability to generate some ideas and concepts
Demonstrates ability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated
Wireframe sketches
are convey 4 or less content
types or groupings
Unacceptable | F range
Demonstrates inability to generate a variety of ideas
and concepts
Demonstrates inability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated
Wireframe sketches do not successfully convey content types, or groupings
Part 3: Digital Wireframes
6 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Initial wireframe sketches
are evident in both the static and coded wireframes.
Coded wireframe follows HTML and CSS best practices as demonstrated in class.
Wireframes properly break for mobile and desktop screens and all their components fit within the given dimensions
Acceptable | C range
Initial wireframe sketches
are somewhat evident in both the static and coded wireframes.
Coded wireframe has a few issues with the HTML and CSS code.
Some issues with content not resizing or changing when screen is resized.
Unacceptable | F range
Initial wireframe sketches
are not evident in both the static and coded wireframes.
Coded wireframe has numerous issues with the HTML and CSS code.
Multiple issues with content not resizing or changing when the screen is resized.
Part 4: Style Tiles
6 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Three style tiles with three distinct visual directions
Style tiles successfully convey visual directions the final piece could look like.
Style tiles showcase elements that create a visually cohesive system.
Acceptable | C range
Three style tiles with three variations of one distinct visual style.
Style tiles are very similar with only one or two changes.
Some elements do not visually fit with the design system.
Unacceptable | F range
One or two style tiles
are under developed.
Style tiles are very similar with only one or two changes.
No cohesive visual system is evident.
Part 5: Static Digital Layout
6 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Initial wireframe sketches
are evident in the static
digital layout
Develops composition clearly reflecting principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity, etc.)
Static digital layouts for mobile devices and desktops are completed for home page and a portfolio page
Acceptable | C range
Initial wireframe sketches
are somewhat evident in the static digital layout
Develops composition somewhat reflecting principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity etc.)
Static digital layouts are missing 1-2 screens and is missing some content.
Unacceptable | F range
Initial wireframe sketches and ideas are not evident in the static digital layout
Develops composition lacking any principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity, etc.)
Static digital layout still contains dummy content or is missing content items
Part 6-7: Coded Site
6 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Final site has no errors in the HTML and CSS code
Website includes breaks for mobile devices and desktops with no issues when browser is resized.
All external source files (CSS and jQuery or Javascript) are correctly linked and formatted
Final site is live on the students GitHub.io page
All assets are successfully formatted for the web.
Acceptable | C range
Final site has a few errors
in the HTML and CSS code
Website includes some breaks for mobile devices and desktops with 1-2 issues when browser is resized.
Some external source files (CSS and jQuery or Javascript) are missing and others aren’t formatted correctly.
Final site is live on the student’s GitHub.io page
Some assets are to large or not properly formatted for the web.
Unacceptable | F range
Final site has numerous errors in the HTML, CSS, and jQuery code
Website is only formatted for mobile or desktop devices not both.
Majority of external source files (CSS and jQuery or Javascript) are missing and others aren’t formatted correctly.
Final site is only a local copy, not published live on student’s GitHub.io page.
Majority of assets are too large or not properly formatted for the web.
Deadlines
3 pts
Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range
Meets assignment deadlines
Demonstrates solid evidence of design process and development
Turns final deliverables
in on time
Acceptable | C range
Generally meets assignment deadlines, does not always come to class prepared
Demonstrates loose evidence of design process and development
Turns final deliverables
in on time
Unacceptable | F range
Does not meet
assignment deadlines
Demonstrates little to no evidence of design process and development
Turns final deliverables in after class has started on day assignment is due
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.