Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
User's Guide
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Journal Club Presentation - 2021 rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Journal Club Presentation - 2021
Journal Club Presentation - updated 2019
Rubric Code:
S2264C3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Journal Club Presentation
Descriptions
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Content
Knowledge
Poor
Student does not have grasp of information, exhibited by more than one major gap in understanding.
Fair
Student demonstrates limited knowledge of material with at least one major gap in understanding.
Good
Student demonstrates adequate knowledge of material with only minor gaps in understanding.
Excellent
Student demonstrates full knowledge by presenting the materials accurately.
Critique
Poor
No critical analysis of the article.
Fair
Student present strengths and weaknesses of the article that are not well thought or with at least one major gap in understanding.
Good
Student presents strengths and weaknesses of the article with some minor gaps in understanding.
Excellent
Student accurately presents strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Discussion
Poor
Student cannot answer questions about subject.
Fair
Student is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Good
Student is able to answer questions without elaboration.
Excellent
Student addresses all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Organization
Poor
Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Fair
Audience has difficult following presentation because student jumps around.
Good
Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.
Excellent
Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Mechanics
Poor
Poor designed / ineffective slides (text heavy) or has four or more spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Fair
Significant extraneous (not discussed) or missing important information. Presentation has three or less misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Good
Few extraneous or missing information on slides and has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Excellent
Effectively designed slides with no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Delivery
Verbal skills
Poor
Student's voice is low or monotonous tone which causes audience to disengage. Presentation is delivered too fast to comprehend or too slow/monotonous to maintain audience interest.
Fair
Student's voice is low so that not some members of audience have difficulty hearing presentation, or speaks in uneven volume with little or no inflection.
Good
Student's voice is clear so that most can hear; speaks with satisfactory variation of volume and inflection.
Excellent
Student uses a clear voice and pace so that all audience members can hear and understand presentation.
Non-verbal skills
Poor
No eye contact with audience or entire report is read from notes. No movement or descriptive gestures.
Fair
Displayed minimal eye contact with audience or mostly read from the notes. Very little movement or descriptive gestures.
Good
Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes. Made movements or gestures that enhances articulation.
Excellent
Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes. Movements seem fluid and help the audience visualize.
Poise
Poor
Tension and nervousness is obvious.
Fair
Displays mild tension, has troubled recovering from mistakes.
Good
Student is mostly relaxed.
Excellent
Student displays relaxed, self-confident nature about self.
Enthusiasm
Poor
No interest in topic presented.
Fair
Shows little interest in the topic.
Good
Occasionally exhibits enthusiasm during presentation.
Excellent
Demonstrates enthusiasm during presentation.
Time
Poor
Presentation is shorter than minimum time by 5+ mins.
Fair
Presentation is shorter than minimum time.
Good
Presentation within time frame with <5 minutes left for discussion.
Excellent
Presentation within time frame with >=5 minutes left for discussion.
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.