iRubric: Mission Audit rubric

The school leader does not evaluate or define the current mission and vision statements. The leader is unable to identify areas of strength and weakness.

The school leader categorizes and partially defines most components of the current mission and vision statements. The leader is unable to clearly identify areas of strength and weakness.

The school leader evaluates and defines all components of the current mission and vision statements. The leader identifies areas of strength and weakness.

The school leader evaluates and explicitly defines all components of the current mission and vision statements. The depth of analysis demonstrates the leader’s understanding of the clarity and strength of the statements as well as gaps and areas of weakness.

The school leader’s suggested area for improvement does not align to the analysis of current needs.The school leader provides a limited data collection plan that does not include adequate quantitative and qualitative data sources that measure the concept.

The school leader suggests an area for improvement though it may not fully align to the analysis of current needs. The school leader includes a data collection plan that does not include adequate quantitative and qualitative data sources that measure the concept.

The school leader justifies an area for improvement based on the analysis of current needs. The leader develops a data collection plan that includes adequate quantitative and qualitative data sources that measure the concept.

The school leader justifies an area for improvement based on the analysis of current needs. The leader develops a strong data collection plan that includes robust quantitative and qualitative data sources that directly align to the concept being measured.