- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: SMCP s19 Memo 2 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
SMCP s19 Memo 2 SMCP s18 Memo 2 Rubric Code: QXC48AW By amische Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

SMCP Memo #2 Descriptions
	Excellent Criterion is exceptionally well developed 2 pts	Good Criterion is present and capably executed. 1.5 pts	Fair Criterion is there but insufficiently executed or unclear 1 pts	Poor Criterion is missing from the paper. 0.5 pts
Q1 and Q2: Contentious performances
Q1: Contained, violent, disruptive? Shows a strong understanding of the difference between contained, disruptive and violent performances, using associated terminology; AND: Shows vividly how your movement performs and moves between these types of performances	Excellent	Good .	Fair .	Poor
Q2: Principle or strategy? Clearly discusses the differences between nonviolence as a principle or a strategy, providing vivid examples from your movement and showing deep and nuanced understanding of this distinction	Excellent .	Good	Fair	Poor
Q3: Nonviolent civil resistance
Definition of five concepts Clearly and accurately defines all FIVE terms, using associated terminology from readings and class notes in the discussion of the case	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Application of concepts to the case Clear and compelling application of all FIVE concepts to the case; shows a deep and nuanced practical understanding of the core arguments of theories of non-violent civil resistance (NVCR).	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Writing clarity and grammar
Writes clearly and grammatically	Excellent Sentences are consistently grammatical, with hardly any errors throughout. Sentences are clear, graceful and fluid. A pleasure to read.	Good Occasional awkward spots, rough writing, confusing word choice or minor grammatical errors. Distracts from reader focus on ideas.	Fair Frequent grammatical errors, such as such as run-ons, fragment sentences, subject-verb agreement, pronoun agreement, verb tense, commas, punctuation, spelling. Hard to concentrate on ideas. I SUGGEST YOU TAKE YOUR NEXT PAPER TO THE WRITING CENTER BEFORE SUBMISSION.	Poor Serious and consistent problems in grammar, punctuation and/or spelling. Writing is rough and choppy. Difficult and frustrating to read. NEXT PAPER MUST BE TAKEN TO THE WRITING CENTER BEFORE SUBMISSION.