Skip to main content
iRubric: Spring 2020 IL Application Assignment rubric

iRubric: Spring 2020 IL Application Assignment rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Spring 2020 IL Application Assignment 
Fall 2019 IL Application Assignment
Rubric Code: Q2W95X6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Spring 20 IL Application Assignment
  Exceeds

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Developing

2 pts

Novice

1 pts

Context (2x)
8 pts

REPA 6.1 - using data to identify needs and priorities within the organization and to address organizational barriers to attaining student achievement goals.

NELP Components 1.2 and 6.2
Exceeds

The Remick Leader displays a thorough understanding of standardized assessment in the internship school, including rationale for its inclusion.
Proficient

The Remick Leader displays an understanding of standardized assessment in the internship school, including rationale for its inclusion.
Developing

The Remick Leader displays a limited understanding of standardized assessment in the internship school, including rationale for its inclusion.
Novice

The Remick Leader struggles to display any understanding of standardized assessment in the internship school, including rationale for its inclusion.
Metrics (2x)
8 pts

REPA 2.3 - using frequent classroom observation and student performance data to evaluate instructional quality, and regularly providing teachers with prompt, high-quality feedback aimed at improving student outcomes

NELP Component 7.4
Exceeds

The Remick Leader provides a thorough presentation of the assessment’s metrics, how they are utilized to support student outcomes, particularly in relation to proficiency, and opportunities moving forward.
Proficient

The Remick Leader provides a presentation of the assessment’s metrics, how they are utilized to support student outcomes, particularly in relation to proficiency, and opportunities moving forward.
Developing

The Remick Leader provides a limited presentation of the assessment’s metrics, how they are utilized to support student outcomes, particularly in relation to proficiency, and opportunities moving forward.
Novice

The Remick Leader struggles to provide a presentation of the assessment’s metrics, how they are utilized to support student outcomes, and opportunities moving forward.
Perceptions (2x)
8 pts

REPA 3.5 - using reflection, self-awareness, ongoing learning, and resiliency to increase effectiveness in leading school improvement efforts

NELP Components 2.1 and 7.3
Exceeds

The Remick Leader provides a detailed, thorough reflection on the perceptions of various stakeholders on student achievement, proficiency, and growth.
Proficient

The Remick Leader provides a reflection on the perceptions of various stakeholders on student achievement, proficiency, and growth.
Developing

The Remick Leader provides a limited reflection on the perceptions of various stakeholders on student achievement, proficiency, and growth.
Novice

The Remick Leader provides a limited analysis reflection on the perceptions of various stakeholders on student achievement, proficiency, and/or growth.
Writing Quality (1x)
4 pts

REPA 3.1 - modeling professional, ethical, and respectful behavior at all times and expecting the same behavior from others

NELP Component 2.3
Exceeds

The Remick Leader displays academic professionalism with a high degree of clarity and efficiency; there are few to no errors in citations, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Proficient

The Remick Leader displays some academic professionalism with writing that is mostly clear and efficient; there are several errors in citations, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Developing

The Remick Leader displays limited academic professionalism with writing that may be wordy or unclear; there may be many errors in citations, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Novice

The Remick leader struggles to model academic professionalism with significant errors in citations, efficiency, clarity, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202