Skip to main content
iRubric: Instructional Framework 2020 rubric

iRubric: Instructional Framework 2020 rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Instructional Framework 2020 
Curriculum Development 2020
Rubric Code: P2X5AW2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Instructional Framework
  Exemplary - 4

In addition to Proficient

4 pts

Proficient - 3

Required for Passing

3 pts

Developing - 2

2 pts

Unsatisfactory - 1

1 pts

Rationale (x2)
8 pts

Component 3.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate, and advocate for equitable, inclusive, and culturally responsive instruction and behavior support practices among teachers and staff.
Exemplary - 4

The Remick Leader articulates a rationale for a shared instructional framework that explicitly connects its impact for adult and student learning.

The Remick Leader integrates the criteria of success and scholarship to support their articulation.
Proficient - 3

The Remick Leader articulates a rationale for a shared instructional framework that names its impact for adult and student learning.

The Remick Leader includes the criteria of success and scholarship to support their articulation.
Developing - 2

The Remick Leader articulates a rationale for a shared instructional framework names its impact for adult or student learning.

The Remick Leader includes the criteria of success and minimal scholarship to support their articulation.
Unsatisfactory - 1

The Remick Leader articulates a rationale for a shared instructional framework that does not name its impact for adult and student learning.

The Remick Leader does not include the criteria of success and/or scholarship to support their articulation.
Essential Practices - Purpose and Relevance (x1)
4 pts

Component 4.2 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop, and implement high-quality and equitable academic and non-academic instructional practices, resources, technologies, and services that support equity, digital literacy, and the school’s academic and non-academic systems.
Exemplary - 4

The Remick Leader articulates a comprehensive, yet succinct description of purpose and relevance and integrates scholarship to support the description.

The description includes a clear definition, how it impacts student learning, and integrates understanding (the why and what) of all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Proficient - 3

The Remick Leader articulates a description of purpose and relevance and includes scholarship to support their description.

The description includes a definition, its impact on student learning, and all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Developing - 2

The Remick Leader articulates a description of purpose and relevance. Scholarship is included, but is not relevant to the description.

The description includes two of the following: a definition, its impact on student learning, or all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Unsatisfactory - 1

The Remick Leader articulates a description of purpose and relevance, but does include scholarship to support their description.

The description includes only one of the following: a definition, its impact on student learning, or all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Essential Practices - Methodology (x1)
4 pts

Component 4.2 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop, and implement high-quality and equitable academic and non-academic instructional practices, resources, technologies, and services that support equity, digital literacy, and the school’s academic and non-academic systems.
Exemplary - 4

The Remick Leader articulates a comprehensive, yet succinct description of methodology and integrates scholarship to support the description.

The description includes a clear definition, how it impacts student learning, and integrates understanding (the why and what) of all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.

The description includes the rationale for and criteria of success for all four components (explicit, guided, collaborative, and independent).
Proficient - 3

The Remick Leader articulates a description of methodology and includes scholarship to support their description.

The description includes a definition, its impact on student learning, and all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.

The description includes the criteria of success for all four components (explicit, guided, collaborative, and independent).
Developing - 2

The Remick Leader articulates a description of methodology. Scholarship is included, but is not relevant to the description.

The description includes two of the following: a definition, its impact on student learning, or all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.

The description includes the criteria of success for 2-3 of the four components (explicit, guided, collaborative, and independent).
Unsatisfactory - 1

The Remick Leader articulates a description of methodology, but does include scholarship to support their description.

The description includes only one of the following: a definition, its impact on student learning, or all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.

The description includes the criteria of success for less than two of the four components (explicit, guided, collaborative, and independent).
Essential Practices - Formative Assessment (x1)
4 pts

Component 4.2 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop, and implement high-quality and equitable academic and non-academic instructional practices, resources, technologies, and services that support equity, digital literacy, and the school’s academic and non-academic systems.
Exemplary - 4

The Remick Leader articulates a comprehensive, yet succinct description of formative assessment and integrates scholarship to support the description.

The description includes a clear definition, how it impacts student learning, and integrates understanding (the why and what) of all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Proficient - 3

The Remick Leader articulates a description of formative assessment and includes scholarship to support their description.

The description includes a definition, its impact on student learning, and all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Developing - 2

The Remick Leader articulates a description of formative assessment. Scholarship is included, but is not relevant to the description.

The description includes two of the following: a definition, its impact on student learning, or all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Unsatisfactory - 1

The Remick Leader articulates a description of formative assessment, but does include scholarship to support their description.

The description includes only one of the following: a definition, its impact on student learning, or all four benchmarks that build collective capacity.
Professionalism
4 pts

Component 2.1 understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflect on, communicate about, cultivate, and model professional dispositions and norms (i.e., fairness, integrity, transparency, trust, digital citizenship, collaboration, perseverance, reflection, lifelong learning) that support the educational success and well-being of each student and adult.
Exemplary - 4

The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and mode academic professionalism and integrity with no errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Proficient - 3

The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with minimal (2-4) errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Developing - 2

The Remick Leader demonstrates a developing capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with several (5+) errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Unsatisfactory - 1

The Remick Leader demonstrates unsatisfactory academic professionalism and integrity with many errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202