Skip to main content
iRubric: Full IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions

iRubric: Full IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Full IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions 
Full IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions
This is the rubric that will be used for grading the Full-IRE. Marking Conventions: WM = Writing Mechanics (includes spelling, grammar, and other mechanical infelicities) CL = Clarity (includes imprecisions and ambiguities in writing that mitigate the clarity/perspicuity of your piece) **Problems with mechanics and clarity will affect scores for each of the components to the extent they are present therein**
Rubric Code: P2X56W6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Philosophy  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Full-IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions
  Flawed

3 pts

Acceptable

3.5 pts

Good

4 pts

Exemplary

5 pts

Component 1: Analytic-Interpretive
20 pts

• Accuracy (A): Do you understand what the author is arguing?

• Efficiency (E): Have you conveyed only the most import argumentative steps?
Flawed

• (A): thesis and argument(s) are substantially misrepresented

• (E): significantly lacking in efficiency
Acceptable

• (A): thesis and argument(s) are
generally presented accurately

• (E): generally efficient
Good

• (A): thesis and argument(s) are mostly presented accurately

• (E): mostly efficient
Exemplary

• (A): thesis and argument(s) are presented accurately and with nuance

• (E): superior efficiency
Component 2: Analytic-Critical
20 pts

• Relevance of Objection (RO): Is your objection germane to the author’s argument?

• Strength of Objection (SO): To what extent is your objection supported by reasons? How
strong are those reasons?
Flawed

• (RO): objection largely misses the point or largely off target

• (SO): objection largely unpersuasive
Acceptable

• (RO): objection is “in the
neighborhood” of author’s position

• (SO): objection not without some merit, but still lacking in important ways
Good

• (RO): objection strikes “near the center” of author’s position

• (SO): objection strong, though lacking in minor ways
Exemplary

• (RO): objection is “spot on;” strikes at heart of author’s position

• (SO): objection perceptive, persuasive, and powerful
Component 3: Pedagogical
5 pts

• Relevance/Centrality (R/C): Does your example/illustration powerfully illumine something of central importance to the author’s position?
Flawed

• (R/C): example entirely or largely fails to address something of central argumentative importance
Acceptable
Good

• (R/C): example addresses something of central argumentative importance but lacks full imagination and creativity
Exemplary

• (R/C): example addresses something of central argumentative importance in a creative, evocative way
Component 4: Practical
5 pts

• Relevance/Centrality (R/C): How central to the author’s thesis is your reflection on why it matters?

• Depth of Inquiry (DI): To what extent does your reflection on why the author’s thesis matters reveal a depth of inquiry (i.e., thinking deeply and imaginatively about implications)?
Flawed

• (R/C): exploration entirely or largely fails to capture and express an implication of central argumentative importance

• (DI): exploration fails to reflect deep and imaginative thinking
Acceptable
Good

• (R/C): exploration mostly captures and
expresses an implication of central argumentative importance

• (DI): exploration reflects some depth and imagination
Exemplary

• (R/C): exploration fully captures and expresses an implication of central argumentative importance

• (DI): exploration reflects profound depth and imagination





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178