iRubric: Proto IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Proto IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions Full IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions This is the rubric that will be used for grading the Proto-IRE. Marking Conventions: WM = Writing Mechanics (includes spelling, grammar, and other mechanical infelicities) CL = Clarity (includes imprecisions and ambiguities in writing that mitigate the clarity/perspicuity of your piece) Problems with mechanics and clarity will affect scores for each of the components to the extent they are present therein Rubric Code: P2X39CX Ready to use Public Rubric Locked Rubric Subject: Philosophy Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Proto-IRE Grading Rubric/Conventions Descriptions
	Flawed The range of points for this is 0 - 3. 3 pts	Acceptable 3.5 pts	Good 4 pts	Exemplary 5 pts
Component 1: Analytic-Interpretive 5 pts • Accuracy (A): Do you understand what the author is arguing? • Efficiency (E): Have you conveyed only the most import argumentative steps?	Flawed • (A): thesis and argument(s) are substantially misrepresented • (E): significantly lacking in efficiency	Acceptable • (A): thesis and argument(s) are generally presented accurately • (E): generally efficient	Good • (A): thesis and argument(s) are mostly presented accurately • (E): mostly efficient	Exemplary • (A): thesis and argument(s) are presented accurately and with nuance • (E): superior efficiency
Component 2: Analytic-Critical 5 pts • Relevance of Objection (RO): Is your objection germane to the author’s argument? • Strength of Objection (SO): To what extent is your objection supported by reasons? How strong are those reasons?	Flawed • (RO): objection largely misses the point or largely off target • (SO): objection largely unpersuasive	Acceptable • (RO): objection is “in the neighborhood” of author’s position • (SO): objection not without some merit, but still lacking in important ways	Good • (RO): objection strikes “near the center” of author’s position • (SO): objection strong, though lacking in minor ways	Exemplary • (RO): objection is “spot on;” strikes at heart of author’s position • (SO): objection perceptive, persuasive, and powerful