Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
User's Guide
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Mission Analysis and Improvement rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Mission Analysis and Improvement
Mission Analysis and Improvement
Rubric Code:
P2282AW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Mission Analysis and Improvement
Descriptions
Unsatisfactory
1 pts
Developing
2 pts
Proficient
3 pts
Exemplary
4 pts
Mission analysis and definitions
Unsatisfactory
The school leader does not evaluate or define the current mission and vision statement using the eight categories. The leader is unable to identify areas of strength and weakness.
Developing
The school leader categorizes and partially defines most components of the current mission and vision statements using the eight categories. The leader is unable to clearly identify areas of strength and weakness.
Proficient
The school leader evaluates and defines all components of the current mission and vision statement using the eight categories. The leader identifies areas of strength and weakness.
Exemplary
The school leader evaluates and explicitly defines all components of the current mission and vision statements using the eight categories. The depth of analysis demonstrates the leader’s understanding of the clarity and strength of the statements as well as gaps and areas of weakness.
Goals
Unsatisfactory
The school leader’s suggested area for improvement does not align to the analysis of current needs.The school leader provides general goals that may not fully align to mission and vision and that lack multiple criteria of success
Developing
The school leader suggests an area for improvement though it may not fully align to the analysis of current needs. The school leader includes goals that speak to mission and vision but that are missing key areas of success (particularly specificity and student-focused)
Proficient
The school leader justifies an area for improvement based on the analysis of current needs. The leader develops goals that align to mission and vision and meet most criteria of success
Exemplary
The school leader justifies an area for improvement based on the analysis of current needs. The leader develops strong goals that directly align to mission and vision and meet all criteria of success
Communication
Unsatisfactory
The Remick Leader vaguely describes how he/she will communicate goals to the faculty and staff. The communication plan does not reference concepts from the symbolic frame to establish collective ownership of the goals. The Leader’s plan lacks attention to the content of the goals and/or the process.
Developing
The Remick Leader describes how he/she will communicate goals to the faculty and staff. The communication plan references concepts from the symbolic frame to establish collective ownership of the goals. The Leader’s plan may only attend to the content of the goals or the process.
Proficient
The Remick Leader details how he/she will communicate goals to the faculty and staff. The communication plan applies concepts from the symbolic frame to establish collective ownership of the goals. The Leader’s plan attends to both the content of the goals and the process.
Exemplary
The Remick Leader clearly and succinctly details how he/she will communicate goals to the faculty and staff. The communication plan correctly applies concepts from the symbolic frame to establish collective ownership of the goals. The Leader’s plan attends to both the content of the goals and the process.
Writing
Unsatisfactory
The Remick Leader makes multiple, distracting errors in grammar and usage that often impede understanding. The Leader does not or incorrectly cites course readings and does not explain the connections
Developing
The Remick Leader makes multiple, distracting errors in grammar and usage that occasionally impede understanding. The Leader references course readings but does not fully explain the connections.
Proficient
The Remick Leader makes a few errors in grammar and usage, but the meaning is clear. The Leader correctly cites course readings to explain ideas.
Exemplary
The Remick Leader clearly and concisely communicates through writing. The Leader effectively and correctly cites course readings to support ideas.
Subjects:
Education
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.