Skip to main content

University of Notre Dame

iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: 2021 blog post rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
2021 blog post Project - blog post Rubric Code: P224C66 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Blog post Descriptions
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 0 pts
Title 4 pts	Excellent Title is informative and engaging	Good Title is informative		Poor Title is inappropriate or inaccurate
Motivation 15 pts	Excellent A clear motivation is presented for the topic. The reader understands why this topic is important.	Good The motivation is not clearly presented. The reader may not understand why this topic is important.	Fair The motivation is not presented, but the reader may understand why the topic is important.	Poor The motivation is not presented, and it is not clear why the topic is important.
Mechanics 15 pts	Excellent The relevant mechanics is presented clearly and all new topics are explained well	Good The relevant mechanics are presented clearly but some new topics are not explained well	Fair The relevant mechanics are presented but the new topics are not explained well	Poor No relevant mechanics are presented
Biology 15 pts	Excellent The relevant biology is presented clearly and all new topics are explained well	Good The relevant biology is presented clearly but some new topics are not explained well	Fair The relevant biology is presented but the new topics are not explained well	Poor No relevant biology is presented
Writing 5 pts	Excellent Writing is free from grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors	Good Writing has 1-2 small grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors	Fair Grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are distracting	Poor Writing is difficult to read due to grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors
Audience 5 pts	Excellent Writing is appropriate for the target audience and sparks interest and curiosity	Good Writing is appropriate for the target audience	Fair Writing is mostly appropriate for the target audience	Poor Article is written either significantly above or below the level of the target audience
Sources 4 pts	Excellent All sources and a link for additional reading are mentioned and linked in the body of the text.	Good Sources are included in a bibliography at the end of the article OR no link for additional reading was included		Poor Sources were incomplete
Media 4 pts	Excellent All media have been appropriately sourced and cited. An appropriate feature image has been selected	Good Some media have been appropriately sourced and cited OR no feature image was selected		Poor No media have been appropriately sourced and cited OR no media were included
Alt-text 4 pts	Excellent Appropriately descriptive alt-text has been included for all media	Good Alt-text is not appropriately descriptive		Poor Images are missing alt-text
Length 2 pts	Excellent Article is approximately 500 words long			Poor Article is too long (>700 words) or too short (<400 words)
Tags 2 pts	Excellent 1-5 appropriate tags have been selected			Poor No tags were selected

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202