Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
User's Guide
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ACCT 70131 Revenue Case 2017 rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ACCT 70131 Revenue Case 2017
Revenue Case Session 21
For use in a multiple performance obligation technical accounting research case
Rubric Code:
NX78AB5
By
jfuehrme
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Accounting
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Revenue - Multiple Performance
Descriptions
Exceeds Expectations
1 pts
Meets Most Expectations
0.8 pts
Meets Some Expectations
0.6 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0.4 pts
Organization
15 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Appears neat & organized; logical; no spelling or grammar errors; uses active voice; guides the reader through the case; gets to the point.
Meets Most Expectations
Generally logical but occasionally skips around; few lapses in grammar or spelling; generally guides the reader.
Meets Some Expectations
Skips around, but addresses all the points; occasional lapses in grammar and or spelling; reader must work to follow the train of thought
Does Not Meet Expectations
Haphazard; difficult to follow; several grammar and or spelling errors; generally sloppy in appearance
Facts
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Summarizes the facts completely; key facts identified; distinguishes between facts and assumptions
Meets Most Expectations
Demonstrates an understanding of most facts and generally recognizes those facts that must be challenged
Meets Some Expectations
Generally understands the facts; does not distinguish between facts and assumptions; recognizes some items that should be challenged
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not recognize the facts of the case and does not demonstrate an understanding of them; challenges nothing
Issues
10 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Identifies the appropriate key issues; identifies any implied issues; goes beyond the minimums asked in the case
Meets Most Expectations
Identifies most key issues and some implied issues; handles the minimum requirements well and recognizes some issues beyond them
Meets Some Expectations
identifies some key issues but does not recognize implied issues; does not go beyond the minimum requirements of the case
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not recognize the key issues of the case; does not understand the questions being asked and/or the accounting questions being posed
Applicable Literature
25 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Identifies all applicable literature; does not include extraneous material; demonstrates the relationship between the selected literature and the issues at hand; recognizes nuances and subtle relationships between literature and issues
Meets Most Expectations
Identifies most of the applicable literature; includes some extraneous material; generally connects the issues to the literature identified but misses the subtle points
Meets Some Expectations
Identifies some of the appropriate literature but includes much that is not on point; does not connect appropriate literature to all the identified issues
Does Not Meet Expectations
Appears to be reaching for anything no matter how remotely related; clips large sections of material and pastes it into the memo in hope that the reader may find some connection; references included are generally irrelevant
Discussion & Analysis
25 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues; presents persuasive arguments directly relating the facts to the issues and clearly tying them to the identified literature
Meets Most Expectations
Generally analyzes all the issues in light of the literature identified, but does not connect in some areas; arguments are not always persuasive and leave some work to the reader to connect the dots
Meets Some Expectations
Analysis is superficial; treats some issues as "given" when a challenging analysis is required; arguments are not well supported; arguments are one-sided and do not address alternatives
Does Not Meet Expectations
Appears lost; does not understand the issues sufficiently to be able to connect them to the literature and evaluate them; does not understand the case
Conclusion
15 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Conclusion follows clearly from the analysis; it is logical and supported; there is no hedging and no part of the conclusion is unsupported
Meets Most Expectations
Conclusions generally follow from the analysis but support is not fully integrated into the conclusion; leaves some work to the reader; offers some unsupported conclusions
Meets Some Expectations
Some conclusions follow from the analysis, but not clearly; conclusions are "hedged" with new issues or alternatives not previously discussed
Does Not Meet Expectations
Conclusions are unsupported; they do not follow logically from the analysis
Keywords:
Individual Case Memorandum
Subjects:
Accounting
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.