iRubric: Case Study Analysis rubric

The Remick Leader’s paper fully addresses the elements of the case study. A clear depth of thinking is evident, as the leader demonstrates comprehensive thinking.

The Remick Leader’s paper addresses most of the elements of the case study. Some thinking was not fully developed and feedback provided additional ways to examine the issues at hand.

The Remick Leader’s paper addresses some of the elements of the case study. The analysis did not present a depth of examining the issues present in the case.

The Remick Leader’s paper does not address the issue presented. The leader misunderstood the case and suggestions for how to handle the issues were not in line with course readings or teachings.

The Remick Leader’s paper incorporates significant reflection on the participant’s experience as a teacher and/or administrator.

The Remick Leader’s paper contains some reflection on the participant’s experience as a teacher and/or administrator.

The Remick Leader’s paper has
minimal reflection on the participants experience as a teacher and/or
administrator.

There is no personal reflection on the Remick Leader’s experience.