Skip to main content
iRubric: Fall 2020 EM Application Assignment rubric

iRubric: Fall 2020 EM Application Assignment rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Fall 2020 EM Application Assignment 
Fall 2019 EM Application Assignment
Rubric Code: M2X76BW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Fall 2020 EM Application Assignment
  Exemplary (4) In addition to profic

4 pts

Proficient (3) Required for passing

3 pts

Developing (2)

2 pts

Unsatisfactory (1)

1 pts

Component 5.2
8 pts

Description of Experience (2x)
Exemplary (4) In addition to profic

The Remick Leader provides a comprehensive description of the internship school’s governance model, the meeting context, attendees, and agenda items.
Proficient (3) Required for passing

The Remick Leader provides a description of the internship school’s governance model, the meeting context, attendees, and agenda items.
Developing (2)

The Remick Leader provides a limited description of the internship school’s governance model, the meeting context, attendees, and/or agenda items.
Unsatisfactory (1)

The Remick Leader provides an insufficient description of the internship school’s governance model, the meeting context, attendees, and/or agenda items.
Component 6.1
8 pts

Exceptional Board Practices (2x)
Exemplary (4) In addition to profic

The Remick Leader provides a comprehensive analysis of the meeting, citing ways in which exceptional board practices were met (or failed to be met) and citing how effective practices of a school leader to collaborate with the board were met (or failed to be met). The Remick Leader includes multiple citations of exceptional board practices and effective practices of board management.
Proficient (3) Required for passing

The Remick Leader provides an analysis of the meeting, citing ways in which exceptional board practices were met (or failed to be met) and citing how effective practices of a school leader to collaborate with the board were met (or failed to be met).
Developing (2)

The Remick Leader provides a limited analysis of the meeting, citing few ways in which exceptional board practices were met (or failed to be met) and/or citing few ways effective practices of a school leader to collaborate with the board were met (or failed to be met).
Unsatisfactory (1)

The Remick Leader provides a limited analysis of the meeting, failing to cite how exceptional board practices were met (or failed to be met) or how effective practices of a school leader to collaborate with the board were met (or failed to be met).
Component 2.1
8 pts

Reflection (2x)
Exemplary (4) In addition to profic

The Remick Leader provides a compelling personal reflection of the experience, insightfully incorporating a Remick disposition and demonstrating self-awareness and an ongoing desire to learn how to more effectively manage a school board.
Proficient (3) Required for passing

The Remick Leader provides a personal reflection of the experience, demonstrating self-awareness and an ongoing desire to learn how to more effectively manage a school board.
Developing (2)

The Remick Leader provides a limited personal reflection of the experience that may be more summarizing than analysis or may lack self-awareness.
Unsatisfactory (1)

The Remick Leader struggles to provide a personal reflection of the experience or only summarizes the experience instead of analyzing it.
Component 2.1
4 pts

Writing Quality (1x)
Exemplary (4) In addition to profic

The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with zero errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability and thoroughly citing readings and/or videos.
Proficient (3) Required for passing

The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with minimal errors (2-4) in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability and citing readings and/or videos.
Developing (2)

The Remick Leader demonstrates a developing capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with several (5+) errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability and somewhat citing readings and/or videos.
Unsatisfactory (1)

The Remick Leader displays unsatisfactory academic professionalism and integrity with many errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability and failing to cite readings and/or videos.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202