Skip to main content
iRubric: VCD 03 | Project 2 – Game/Learning Tool rubric

iRubric: VCD 03 | Project 2 – Game/Learning Tool rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
VCD 03 | Project 2 – Game/Learning Tool 
VCD 03 | Project 1 – Letterform
What is a rubric? A rubric explains the criteria I use in assigning grades and serves as a guide to help you as you complete your projects. What constitutes “A” work? I have not specified what constitutes an “A” to help you focus on doing the best work that you can with out being preoccupied by whether or not you’ve done just enough to get the right letter grade. Design is a creative endeavor. Consequently, doing well depends on more than just fulfilling the bare minimum assignment requirements.
Rubric Code: KXB239B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Project 2: Game/Learning Tool
  Exceptional | A+ range

4 pts

Very Good | B+ range

3.56 pts

Acceptable | C range

3.04 pts

Unacceptable | F range

2.36 pts

Content
3 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Demonstrates clear understanding of assignment

Follows instructions as specified on assignment sheet
Acceptable | C range

Demonstrates basic understanding of assignment

Generally follows instructions
Unacceptable | F range

Demonstrates vague understanding of assignment

Fails to follow instructions
Part 1–2: Sketching & Ideation
4 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Demonstrates ability to generate a variety of ideas and concepts

Demonstrates ability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated

Wireframe sketches successfully convey content types and groupings.
Acceptable | C range

Demonstrates ability to generate some ideas and concepts

Demonstrates ability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated

Wireframe sketches
are missing 1-2 content
types or groupings
Unacceptable | F range

Demonstrates inability to generate a variety of ideas and concepts

Demonstrates inability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated

Wireframe sketches
do not successfully
convey content types,
or groupings
Part 3: User Testing
6 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Demonstrates ability to create a low fidelity prototype that is easy for the user to understand and interact with.

Successfully runs user
testing interviews that includes photos, notes, and the insights gained.

Conducts at least two user testing interviews
Acceptable | C range

The low fidelity prototype is somewhat difficult for the user to understand

Notes and documentation from the user interviews somewhat indicate insights gained.

Conducts only one
user testing interview
Unacceptable | F range

Demonstrates inability to get create a low fidelity prototype that is easy for the user to understand and interact with.

User testing interview
not well documented
with few to no insights
gained from it.

Has no documentation of user testing.
Part 4: Digital Wireframes
6 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Initial wireframe sketches
are evident in both the static and coded wireframes.

Coded wireframe is interactive using CSS and JQuery or Javascript

Wireframes and all their components fit within
the given dimensions
(1024 x 768).
Acceptable | C range

Initial wireframe sketches
are somewhat evident in both the static and coded wireframes.

Coded wireframe has a few issues with the interactive components

Some wireframe components fall outside the given dimensions (1024 x 768).
Unacceptable | F range

Initial wireframe sketches
are not evident in both the static and coded wireframes.

Coded wireframe is
not interactive.

Multiple wireframe components fall outside the given dimensions (1024 x 768).
Part 5: Style Tiles
6 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Three style tiles with three distinct visual directions

Style tiles successfully convey visual directions the final piece could look like.

Style tiles showcase elements that create a visually cohesive system.
Acceptable | C range

Three style tiles with three variations of one distinct visual style.

Style tiles are very similar with only one or two changes.

Some elements do not visually fit with the design system.
Unacceptable | F range

One or two style tiles
are under developed.

Style tiles are very
similar with only
one or two changes.

No cohesive visual
system is evident.
Part 6: Static Digital Layout
6 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Initial wireframe sketches
are evident in the static
digital layout

Develops composition clearly reflecting principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity, etc.)

Static digital layout contains all of the required content.
Acceptable | C range

Initial wireframe sketches
are somewhat evident in the static digital layout

Develops composition somewhat reflecting principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity etc.)

Static digital layout contains most of the required content.
Unacceptable | F range

Initial wireframe sketches and ideas are not
evident in the static
digital layout

Develops composition lacking any principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity, etc.)

Static digital layout still contains dummy content or is missing content items
Part 7–8: Coded Site
6 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Final site has no errors in the HTML, CSS, and JQuery code

All .css and .js are correctly linked and formatted

Interactive elements work seamlessly when interacted with by the user.

Final site is live on the students GitHub.io page

All assets are successfully formatted for the web.
Acceptable | C range

Final site has a few errors
in the HTML, CSS, and
JQuery code

All .css and .js are correctly linked but have a few formatting errors

Interactive elements have a few bugs when interacted with by the user.

Final site is live on the student’s GitHub.io page

Some assets are to large
or not properly formatted
for the web.
Unacceptable | F range

Final site has a numerous errors in the HTML, CSS, and JQuery code

.Css and .js files are incorrectly linked and have major formatting errors

Final site is not interactive

Final site is only a local copy, not published live on student’s GitHub.io page.

Majority of assets are too large or not properly formatted for the web.
Deadlines
3 pts

Exceptional | A+ range
Very Good | B+ range

Meets assignment deadlines

Demonstrates solid evidence of design process and development

Turns final deliverables
in on time
Acceptable | C range

Generally meets assignment deadlines, does not always come to class prepared

Demonstrates loose evidence of design process and development

Turns final deliverables
in on time
Unacceptable | F range

Does not meet
assignment deadlines

Demonstrates little to no evidence of design process and development

Turns final deliverables in after class has started on day assignment is due





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178