Skip to main content

University of Notre Dame

iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: VCD 03 | Project 2 – Game/Learning Tool rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
VCD 03 \| Project 2 – Game/Learning Tool VCD 03 \| Project 1 – Letterform What is a rubric? A rubric explains the criteria I use in assigning grades and serves as a guide to help you as you complete your projects. What constitutes “A” work? I have not specified what constitutes an “A” to help you focus on doing the best work that you can with out being preoccupied by whether or not you’ve done just enough to get the right letter grade. Design is a creative endeavor. Consequently, doing well depends on more than just fulfilling the bare minimum assignment requirements. Rubric Code: KXB239B Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Project 2: Game/Learning Tool Descriptions
	Exceptional \| A+ range 4 pts	Very Good \| B+ range 3.56 pts	Acceptable \| C range 3.04 pts	Unacceptable \| F range 2.36 pts
Content 3 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Demonstrates clear understanding of assignment Follows instructions as specified on assignment sheet	Acceptable \| C range Demonstrates basic understanding of assignment Generally follows instructions	Unacceptable \| F range Demonstrates vague understanding of assignment Fails to follow instructions
Part 1–2: Sketching & Ideation 4 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Demonstrates ability to generate a variety of ideas and concepts Demonstrates ability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated Wireframe sketches successfully convey content types and groupings.	Acceptable \| C range Demonstrates ability to generate some ideas and concepts Demonstrates ability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated Wireframe sketches are missing 1-2 content types or groupings	Unacceptable \| F range Demonstrates inability to generate a variety of ideas and concepts Demonstrates inability to get ideas down on paper, however loosely communicated Wireframe sketches do not successfully convey content types, or groupings
Part 3: User Testing 6 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Demonstrates ability to create a low fidelity prototype that is easy for the user to understand and interact with. Successfully runs user testing interviews that includes photos, notes, and the insights gained. Conducts at least two user testing interviews	Acceptable \| C range The low fidelity prototype is somewhat difficult for the user to understand Notes and documentation from the user interviews somewhat indicate insights gained. Conducts only one user testing interview	Unacceptable \| F range Demonstrates inability to get create a low fidelity prototype that is easy for the user to understand and interact with. User testing interview not well documented with few to no insights gained from it. Has no documentation of user testing.
Part 4: Digital Wireframes 6 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Initial wireframe sketches are evident in both the static and coded wireframes. Coded wireframe is interactive using CSS and JQuery or Javascript Wireframes and all their components fit within the given dimensions (1024 x 768).	Acceptable \| C range Initial wireframe sketches are somewhat evident in both the static and coded wireframes. Coded wireframe has a few issues with the interactive components Some wireframe components fall outside the given dimensions (1024 x 768).	Unacceptable \| F range Initial wireframe sketches are not evident in both the static and coded wireframes. Coded wireframe is not interactive. Multiple wireframe components fall outside the given dimensions (1024 x 768).
Part 5: Style Tiles 6 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Three style tiles with three distinct visual directions Style tiles successfully convey visual directions the final piece could look like. Style tiles showcase elements that create a visually cohesive system.	Acceptable \| C range Three style tiles with three variations of one distinct visual style. Style tiles are very similar with only one or two changes. Some elements do not visually fit with the design system.	Unacceptable \| F range One or two style tiles are under developed. Style tiles are very similar with only one or two changes. No cohesive visual system is evident.
Part 6: Static Digital Layout 6 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Initial wireframe sketches are evident in the static digital layout Develops composition clearly reflecting principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity, etc.) Static digital layout contains all of the required content.	Acceptable \| C range Initial wireframe sketches are somewhat evident in the static digital layout Develops composition somewhat reflecting principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity etc.) Static digital layout contains most of the required content.	Unacceptable \| F range Initial wireframe sketches and ideas are not evident in the static digital layout Develops composition lacking any principles of design (Hierarchy, Balance, Variety, Unity, etc.) Static digital layout still contains dummy content or is missing content items
Part 7–8: Coded Site 6 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Final site has no errors in the HTML, CSS, and JQuery code All .css and .js are correctly linked and formatted Interactive elements work seamlessly when interacted with by the user. Final site is live on the students GitHub.io page All assets are successfully formatted for the web.	Acceptable \| C range Final site has a few errors in the HTML, CSS, and JQuery code All .css and .js are correctly linked but have a few formatting errors Interactive elements have a few bugs when interacted with by the user. Final site is live on the student’s GitHub.io page Some assets are to large or not properly formatted for the web.	Unacceptable \| F range Final site has a numerous errors in the HTML, CSS, and JQuery code .Css and .js files are incorrectly linked and have major formatting errors Final site is not interactive Final site is only a local copy, not published live on student’s GitHub.io page. Majority of assets are too large or not properly formatted for the web.
Deadlines 3 pts	Exceptional \| A+ range	Very Good \| B+ range Meets assignment deadlines Demonstrates solid evidence of design process and development Turns final deliverables in on time	Acceptable \| C range Generally meets assignment deadlines, does not always come to class prepared Demonstrates loose evidence of design process and development Turns final deliverables in on time	Unacceptable \| F range Does not meet assignment deadlines Demonstrates little to no evidence of design process and development Turns final deliverables in after class has started on day assignment is due

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Arts and Design rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202