Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
User's Guide
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Conference Abstract rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Conference Abstract
Development Strategy and Budget
Rubric Code:
K2X5XCC
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Conference Abstract
Descriptions
Unsatisfactory - 1
1 pts
Developing - 2
2 pts
Proficient - 3
3 pts
Exemplary - 4
4 pts
Content
1 pts
Unsatisfactory - 1
The abstract includes one or none of the following components: most important context, the problem and aim, basic design of intervention, findings/key learnings, and next steps. The overview of the project is incomplete.
Developing - 2
The abstract includes two or three of the following components: most important context, the problem and aim, basic design of intervention, findings/key learnings, and next steps. The overview of the project is incomplete.
Proficient - 3
The abstract includes four of the following components: most important context, the problem and aim, basic design of intervention, findings/key learnings, and next steps. The overview is complete but may provide too much or too little information.
Exemplary - 4
The abstract includes all five components: most important context, the problem and aim, basic design of intervention, findings/key learnings, and next steps. The overview provides the most important information to understand your project.
Professionalism
1 pts
(NELP 2.1, REPA 3.1)
Unsatisfactory - 1
The Remick Leader displays unsatisfactory academic professionalism and integrity with many errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
The abstract is too long or too short and may be written in first person or the incorrect tense.
Developing - 2
The Remick Leader demonstrates a developing capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with several (5+) errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
The abstract is too long or too short and may be written in first person or the incorrect tense.
Proficient - 3
The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with minimal errors (2-4) in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
The abstract is written in 3rd person, past tense but may be too long or too short.
Exemplary - 4
The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with zero errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
The abstract is between 150 - 300 words, written in 3rd person and past tense.
Subjects:
Education
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.