Skip to main content
iRubric: Project 3, Assignment 3.7b rubric

iRubric: Project 3, Assignment 3.7b rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Project 3, Assignment 3.7b 
Project 3, Assignment 3.3
Design project for undergraduate engineering students.
Rubric Code: JXA7C88
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Completeness
  Fully Complete

3 pts

Partially Complete

2 pts

Not Complete

1 pts

not used

0 pts

Technical Memo

• Title Page
• 7 page maximum
• 12 pt, Times New Roman font, 1 in. margins, page numbers
• proper units and inclusion of figures
• proper grammar and spelling
• proper use of sections
• proper use of references
• proper use of appendices
Fully Complete

The report met all the requirements.
Partially Complete

The report had multiple deficiencies but met the majority of the requirements.
Not Complete

The report had significant deficiencies.
not used
Detailed Calculations

Fully Complete

Included in Appendix with explanation/figures in main text.
Partially Complete

Included in Appendix without any explanation/figures in main text.
Not Complete

Not included/Incomplete.
not used
Detailed Drawings

Fully Complete

Included in Appendix with explanation/figures in main text.
Partially Complete

Included in Appendix without any explanation/figures in main text.
Not Complete

Not included/Incomplete.
not used
Bill of Materials

Fully Complete

Included in Appendix with explanation/figures in main text.
Partially Complete

Included in Appendix without any explanation/figures in main text.
Not Complete

Not included/Incomplete.
not used
Proficiency
  Advanced

demonstrated general mastery in all components of problem

4.5 pts

Proficient

demonstrated general mastery of
knowledge and acumen but lacks one or two components

3.5 pts

Competent

demonstrated minimal/marginal knowledge and acumen

2.5 pts

Poor

did not demonstrate knowledge or acumen

1 pts

General Presentation of Material

Advanced

The document is clear, the narrative walks the reader through the design and design justification, and the writing is engaging and polished.
Proficient

The document is clear and the narrative walks the reader through the design and design justification, but the writing is not engaging or polished.
Competent

The document is not clear and the narrative lacks cohesion, but the reader is still able to comprehend the text and main takeaways.
Poor

The document is not clear and the narrative lacks cohesion, such that the reader struggles to comprehend the text and main takeaways.
Presentation of Design Purpose

Advanced

The manuscript clearly articulated the purpose of the design and customer needs /requirements (and how they were established)
Proficient

The manuscript clearly articulated the purpose of the design but did not explain customer needs/requirements and/or how they were established
Competent

The manuscript did not clearly articulate the purpose of the design but did customer needs /requirements (and how they were established)
Poor

The manuscript did not clearly articulate the purpose of the design or customer needs /requirements
Presentation of Design

Advanced

The presentation of the design gave the reader confidence that the design meets the objective of the project (i.e., is appropriate and functional). A systematic approach to the design process that went beyond simple intuitive design was clearly articulated.
Proficient

The presentation of the design offered insights into a systematic design process (from conception to detailed design) but insufficient information was provided such that minor questions on the appropriateness or functionality of the design persisted.
Competent

The presentation of the design lacked sufficient information about a systematic design process such that the reader had serious questions about the appropriateness or functionality of the design.
Poor

The presentation of the design was wholly unclear, and the reader did not understand the design itself or how it is supposed to function.
Evaluation of Design

Advanced

The design was evaluated, with insight both from engineering judgement and the prototype, and insightful additional design efforts or changes were articulated.
Proficient

The design was evaluated, with insight both from engineering judgement and the prototype, but additional design efforts or changes were not clearly articulated.
Competent

Potential improvements to the design or design process are discussed, but the reasoning/motivation was not articulated.
Poor

Potential improvements or changes and evaluation of the design were not included.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178