Skip to main content

University of Notre Dame

iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Travaux écrits rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Travaux écrits Explication de texte These criteria will be used to evaluate students' formal written work. Rubric Code: JX5W6AC By ghaake Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Travail écrit Descriptions
	Outstanding 8 pts	Good 7 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 4 pts
Structure
Introduction	Outstanding Introduction is clear and precise; clearly introduces all the major elements of the essay and appropriately contextualizes it; states a strong, original thesis/argument	Good Introduction is clear and understandable; introduces the important elements of the essay; states a clear thesis/argument	Fair Introduction is understandable; introduces the main elements of the essay; thesis/argument is weak or unclear	Poor Introduction is rudimentary; introduces only the most essential or obvious elements of the essay; thesis/argument is lacking
Development/Argument	Outstanding Development of the analysis is logical and consistently refers back to the thesis, expands on it, and engages it; examples from text strongly support argument; strong critical thinking and originality are evident	Good Development of the analysis is logical and supports thesis; examples from text support argument; critical thinking and some originality are evident	Fair Development of the analysis is minimal; uses few examples from text; analysis approaches simple observation; little or no critical thinking or originality	Poor Development of analysis is lacking or unclear; uses no examples from text; analysis is nothing more than simple observation; no critical thinking or originality
Conclusion	Outstanding Conclusion clearly summarizes what has been accomplished; analysis clearly links to entire text; clearly illustrates importance of essay and implications to the period(s) under study	Good Conclusion summarizes what has been said; analysis illustrates importance of essay.	Fair Conclusion summarizes the essay.	Poor No real conclusion; abrupt ending.
Written Expression
Vocabulary, Grammar & Syntax	Outstanding Few or no grammatical errors; student uses transition words and other communicative strategies to express ideas; vocabulary is rich, varied, and used appropriately	Good Some errors in sentence structure and grammar but is still understandable; student needs to use more transition words to link ideas; vocabulary is sufficient to express ideas accurately	Fair Multiple errors in sentence structure and grammar; no use of transition words to link ideas; vocabulary relies on anglicisms or is repetitive	Poor Little effort and attention to grammar or syntax; frequent use of anglicism; text nearly incomprehensible
Analytical Skills
	Outstanding 10 pts	Good 9 pts	Fair 8 pts	Poor 5 pts
Use of Examples	Outstanding Detailed and pertinent examples from the text and clear explanation on how they relate to the arguments and thesis; examples are presented logically and with critical thought	Good Good examples from the text and explanation on how they relate to the arguments and thesis; examples are presented logically and with some thought	Fair Few examples from the text and explanation of them is banal or does not relate to arguments or thesis; examples are presented randomly	Poor Little to no examples from the text and no explanation of them
Literary Analysis	Outstanding Excellent skill in identifying literary language and imagery; explanation of the ways in which this language and imagery is important to the argument(s)	Good Good skill in identifying types of literary language and imagery; some explanation of the ways in which this language and imagery is important to the argument(s)	Fair Some mention of literary language and imagery but lack of explanation on the ways in which this language and imagery is important to the argument(s)	Poor Little to no mention of literary language and imagery; inability to connect language and imagery to the argument(s)

Keywords:

literature

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178