Skip to main content
iRubric: Development Strategy and Budget rubric

iRubric: Development Strategy and Budget rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Development Strategy and Budget 
EM 2 Journal
Rubric Code: H2X5XW3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Development Strategy and Budget
  Unsatisfactory - 1

1 pts

Developing - 2

2 pts

Proficient - 3

3 pts

Exemplary - 4

4 pts

Description of Development Strategies
1 pts

(NELP 1.2, REPA 2.3)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader does not identify development strategy/ies that align with stakeholder groups. The fundraising goal may be missing and minimal details are provided related to the methods to invite and engage stakeholders.
Developing - 2

The leader identifies a development strategy/ies but it is unclear how the strategy/ies align with stakeholder group/s. The description of the strategy/ies includes the fundraising goal and partial methods to invite and engage the stakeholders.
Proficient - 3

The leader identifies a development strategy/ies that align with most of the stakeholder group/s, but may not align with 1 group. The description of the strategy/ies includes the fundraising goal and mostly clear methods to invite and engage the stakeholders.
Exemplary - 4

The leader identifies a development strategy/ies that align with the stakeholder group/s. The description of the strategy/ies includes the fundraising goal and clear and logically aligned methods to invite and engage the stakeholders.
Justification of Strategy
1 pts

(NELP 1.2, REPA 2.3)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader provides limited justification for the choice of development strategies but does not cite evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful
Developing - 2

The leader provides minimal justification for the choice of development strategies citing some evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful based on limited contextual/historical information from the school
Proficient - 3

The leader provides justification for the choice of development strategies. Evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful is based on contextual/historical information from the school and application of course readings/ discussions is limited.
Exemplary - 4

The leader provides a strong justification for the choice of development strategies citing specific evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful based on specific contextual/historical information from the school and course readings and discussions.
Budget
1 pts

(NELP 6.2, REPA 2.4)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader includes 1 summary budget table which may not be inclusive of all costs for the need and development strategies. The leader does not provide context needed to understand the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Developing - 2

The leader includes 2 summary budget tables which may not be inclusive of all costs for the need and development strategies. The leader provides limited context needed to understand the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Proficient - 3

The leader includes 2 summary budget tables which are inclusive of almost all costs for the need and development strategies. The leader provides context needed to understand the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Exemplary - 4

The leader includes 2 summary budget tables which are inclusive of all costs for the need and development strategies. The leader provides the context needed to understand the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Professionalism (x .05)
0.5 pts

(NELP 2.1, REPA 3.1)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The Remick Leader displays unsatisfactory academic professionalism and integrity with many errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Developing - 2

The Remick Leader demonstrates a developing capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with several (5+) errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Proficient - 3

The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with minimal errors (2-4) in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Exemplary - 4

The Remick Leader demonstrates the capacity to communicate about and model academic professionalism and integrity with zero errors in mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202