Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
User's Guide
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Rubric for academic theology short papers
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Rubric for academic theology short papers
Rubric for Sacramental theology short papers
Rubric Code:
H2W8XAB
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Descriptions
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Very Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Theological understanding
Poor
No understanding of key concepts of assignment
Fair
Misunderstanding of key concepts
Good
Mixed understandings and misunderstandings
Very Good
Understanding of key concepts is evident but does not appear as part of a larger whole
Excellent
Understanding of key concepts related to larger issues of course material
Thesis or main idea
Poor
No main idea expressed in the text of the paper
Fair
Main idea is inaccurate or self-contradictory
Good
Main idea confused or not sustained through the whole essay
Very Good
Main idea shows a significant understanding of the course material and discussion
Excellent
Main idea shows a significant understanding of the course material and its implications for theology; main idea advances beyond the themes of the texts
Argument and support
Including use of images if relevant to this assignment.
Poor
No argument or no support
Fair
Framework of argument and support, but does not support the chosen thesis or is off-topic
Good
Argument is pertinent but support is lacking or poorly chosen
Very Good
Good argument and support, but may go astray at times (not evenly strong throughout the whole essay)
Excellent
Excellent argument supports the main idea with relevant evidence
Style and citations
Poor
Difficult to understand.
Fair
Many errors in grammar or missing citations.
Good
Good style; word choice or rhetorical emphasis sometimes off. Citations not always adequate.
Very Good
Very good style with only one or two errors; full citations without proper formal style.
Excellent
Excellent style and full formal citations.
Subjects:
Humanities
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.