iRubric: Executive Summary Parts 4-5 rubric

The narrative is
incomplete with
limited data presented.
Key learnings are not
identified or based on
evidence. There is no
outline where data is
not yet available.  Does
not clearly reference
data analysis or
incorrectly represents
data analysis.

Provides a narrative that incorporates data, though in tangential connection to the story of improvement.  Either outcome or process data may be missing.
Methods of analysis may not be appropriate to the type of data or the purpose of analysis described.

Key learnings are unclear and are not based on evidence or explained in relationship to the theory of action.

Where data is not yet available, the outline is incomplete or unclear.

Provides a narrative that incorporates data to tell the story of improvement, however it may be disjointed or present some gaps.  The narrative describes the outcome, driver, and process data connected to the theory of action including most details related to collection, analysis, interpretations/key learnings, and limitations.
Explains the key learnings related to drivers and changes ideas though some claims made are not based on evidence and/or explained in relationship to the theory of action.

Where data is not yet available, an outline clearly indicates the type of data that will be reported, the format it will be presented in, and key findings up to this point.

Effectively tells the story of improvement through narrative and data. Fully describes the outcome, driver, and process data connected to the theory of action including details related to collection, analysis, interpretations/key learnings, and limitations. Explains the key learnings related to drivers and changes ideas. The claims made are based on evidence and explained in relationship to the theory of action.

Where data is not yet available, an outline clearly indicates the type of data that will be reported, the format it will be presented in, and key findings up to this point.

Final Executive Summary
Does not provide a summary of the success of the intervention.  Does not explain recommendations for next steps for this school improvement initiative.

For this draft:
Does not provide a summary of the success of the intervention.  Does not explain recommendations for next steps for this school improvement initiative.

Final Executive Summary
Provides a partial summary of the success of the intervention.  Explains limited recommendations for next steps for this school improvement initiative most of which are not clearly connected to the findings (outcome and process) and theory of action.

For this draft you must:
Provides a summary of the success of the intervention with placeholders for final outcome data.
Provides a limited set of bulleted recommendations based on what you have learned thus far. For some recommendations, you explain how it connects to what you learned through your process and outcome data and/or your improved understanding of the theory of action.

Final Executive Summary
Provides a summary of the success of the intervention.  Explains some recommendations for next steps for this school improvement initiative. There is a connection between the recommendations and the findings (outcome and process) and theory of action, however there may be some ambiguity.

For this draft you must:
Provides a summary of the success of the intervention with placeholders for final outcome data.
Provides bulleted recommendations based on what you have learned thus far. For most recommendations, you explain how it connects to what you learned through your process and outcome data and/or your improved understanding of the theory of action.

Final Executive Summary
Provides a succinct summary of the success of the intervention.  Clearly explains recommendations for next steps for this school improvement initiative which build upon the findings (outcome and process) and a more thorough understanding of the theory of action.

For this draft you must:
Provides a succinct summary of the success of the intervention with placeholders for final outcome data.
Provides a comprehensive set of bulleted recommendations based on what you have learned thus far. For each recommendation, you clearly explain how it connects to what you learned through your process and outcome data and/or your improved understanding of the theory of action.

Writing is disorganized, and does not meet the  I&I identified expectations for writing quality (see syllabus).

Writing is minimally organized and is difficult for the reader to follow. Three or more areas of the  I&I identified expectations for writing quality are not met (see syllabus).  

Writing is organized, and meets most  of the  I&I identified expectations for writing quality (see syllabus).  

Writing is focused, well-organized, and compelling and meets all I&I identified expectations for writing quality (see syllabus).