Skip to main content
iRubric: Fund a Need Parts 1 and 2 rubric

iRubric: Fund a Need Parts 1 and 2 rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Fund a Need Parts 1 and 2 
Fund a Need Final Draft
Rubric Code: E228X73
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Development Strategy and Budget
  Unsatisfactory - 1

1 pts

Developing - 2

2 pts

Proficient - 3

3 pts

Exemplary - 4

4 pts

Description of School Context, Mission, and Impact
1 pts

(NELP 1.1, REPA 2.1)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader does not provide sufficient details of the school context. The articulated mission and vision is minimal or missing. No evidence is provided to substantiate the impact of the school.
Developing - 2

The leader provides details of the school context however the description may provide too much or not enough detail to set the stage for understanding the need. The leader minimally articulates the mission and vision. Evidence to substantiate the impact of the school is limited or missing.
Proficient - 3

The leader provides important details of the school context so as to set the stage for understanding the need. The leader articulates the mission and vision and presents some evidence to substantiate the impact of the school.
Exemplary - 4

The leader provides the most important details of the school context so as to set the stage for understanding the need. The leader clearly articulates the mission and vision and presents compelling evidence to substantiate the impact of the school.
Description of Need
1 pts

(NELP 5.2, REPA 5.8; NELP 6.2, REPA 6.1)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader minimally states the need but does not articulate a connection to the mission and vision. The leader provides limited to no explanation of how the funding will be utilized to meet the need.
Developing - 2

The leader states the need and partially articulates how fulfilling this need will advance the school’s mission and vision. The leader minimally describes how the funding will be utilized to meet the need. The description minimally justifies the investment in these specific resources to further the mission/vision.
Proficient - 3

The leader states the need and articulates how fulfilling this need will advance the school’s mission and vision. The leader delineates how the funding will be utilized to meet the need, however it may be too detailed or limited to fully justify the investment in these specific resources to further the mission/vision.
Exemplary - 4

The leader precisely states the need and clearly articulates how fulfilling this need will advance the school’s mission and vision. The leader clearly delineates how the funding will be utilized. The description provides justification for investment in these specific resources to further the mission/vision.
Engagement of Stakeholders
1 pts

(NELP 5.3, REPA 4.2)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The narrative does not integrate story and does not appeal to the reader’s emotion.
Developing - 2

The narrative minimally integrates story and appeals to the reader’s emotion. The value proposition of investing in the campaign is unclear.
Proficient - 3

The narrative integrates story and appeals to the reader’s emotion. The value proposition of investing in the campaign is mostly clear and somewhat compelling.
Exemplary - 4

The narrative effectively weaves in storytelling and appeals to the reader’s emotion. The value proposition of investing in the campaign is clear and compelling.
Description of Development Strategies
1 pts

(NELP 1.2, REPA 2.3)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader does not identify development strategy/ies that align with stakeholder groups. The fundraising goal may be missing and minimal details are provided related to the methods to invite and engage stakeholders.
Developing - 2

The leader identifies a development strategy/ies but it is unclear how the strategy/ies align with stakeholder group/s. The description of the strategy/ies includes the fundraising goal and partial methods to invite and engage the stakeholders.
Proficient - 3

The leader identifies a development strategy/ies that align with most of the stakeholder group/s, but may not align with 1 group. The description of the strategy/ies includes the fundraising goal and mostly clear methods to invite and engage the stakeholders.
Exemplary - 4

The leader identifies a development strategy/ies that align with the stakeholder group/s. The description of the strategy/ies includes the fundraising goal and clear and logically aligned methods to invite and engage the stakeholders.
Justification of Strategy
1 pts

(NELP 1.2, REPA 2.3)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader provides limited justification for the choice of development strategies but does not cite evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful
Developing - 2

The leader provides minimal justification for the choice of development strategies citing some evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful based on limited contextual/historical information from the school
Proficient - 3

The leader provides justification for the choice of development strategies. Evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful is based on contextual/historical information from the school and application of course readings/ discussions is limited.
Exemplary - 4

The leader provides a strong justification for the choice of development strategies citing specific evidence for why the strategy/ies are likely to be successful based on specific contextual/historical information from the school and course readings and discussions.
Budget
1 pts

(NELP 6.2, REPA 2.4)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The leader includes 1 summary budget table which may not be inclusive of all costs for the need and development strategies. The leader does not provide context needed to understand the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Developing - 2

The leader includes 2 summary budget tables which may not be inclusive of all costs for the need and development strategies. The leader provides limited context needed to understand the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Proficient - 3

The leader includes 2 summary budget tables which includes most of the major costs related to the need and strategies. The leader provides context needed to understand the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Exemplary - 4

The leader includes 2 summary budget tables which includes the major costs related to the need and strategies. The leader fully justifies the financial decisions related to this campaign.
Writing
0.5 pts

(NELP 2.1, REPA 3.1)
Unsatisfactory - 1

The Remick Leader makes multiple, distracting errors in grammar and usage that often impede understanding. The Leader does not or incorrectly cites course readings and does not explain the connections
Developing - 2

The Remick Leader makes multiple, distracting errors in grammar and usage that occasionally impede understanding. The Leader references course readings, if applicable, but does not fully explain the connections.
Proficient - 3

The Remick Leader makes a few errors in grammar and usage, but the meaning is clear. The Leader correctly cites course readings to explain idea if applicable.
Exemplary - 4

The Remick Leader clearly and concisely communicates through writing. The Leader effectively and correctly cites course readings to support ideas if applicable




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202