Skip to main content

iRubric: Project 4 Rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Project 4 Rubric 
Rubric Code: CXB7B3W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Reflection Essay
  Zero

0 pts

Passing

22.75 pts

Good

26.25 pts

Very Good

29.75 pts

Excellent

35 pts

Purpose: Focusing Idea

0-35 points

Zero

The writer's reflection essay does not make an argument, does not apply course learning, and does not meet expectations.
Passing

The writer's reflection essay vaguely states how the writer has applied course learning. The writer's argument made about gains made may be overly general, predictable, mechanical, or obvious.
Good

The writer's reflection essay competently articulates how the writer has applied course content through the revisions made.
Very Good

The writer's reflection essay makes an evidence-based argument about how the writer has applied practical, rhetorical, and/or ethical knowledge through the revisions completed.
Excellent

The writer's reflection essay demonstrates and explains significant achievement and development in application of course learning goals and individual learning goals. The writer makes a compelling argument regarding what motivated the revisions completed.
Structure & Development
  Zero

0 pts

Passing

10 pts

Good

15 pts

Very Good

17.5 pts

Excellent

20 pts

Structure & Development

0-20 points

Zero

Reflection essay is underdeveloped or does not meet expectations.
Passing

Reflection essay gestures toward a main idea. Paragraphs offer a minimally discernible rationale for the revisions completed.
Good

Reflection essay is structured with a main point, introduction, and conclusion. Examples from the revised assignment show precisely why the writer made these revisions.
Very Good

Reflection essay is effectively structured with a main point, introduction, conclusion, and well-ordered sentences and paragraphs. Paragraphs give numerous examples from the revised assignment, making it apparent why the revisions were chosen and what they demonstrate about writer's overall development and gains.
Excellent

Reflection essay is excellently structured with a clear main point, introduction with forecast, conclusion, and logically-ordered sentences and paragraphs. Paragraphs give well-chosen and concrete examples from the revised assignment, making it clear why the revisions were selected and what they showcase about writer's significant achievement and development. The revision examples are cited and explained to support an convincing argument about the writer's accomplishments.
Format & Language Conventions
  Zero

0 pts

Passing

10 pts

Good

15 pts

Very Good

17.5 pts

Excellent

20 pts

Format & Language

0-20 points: If Prof. Shumake has to email with an upload reminder, minus 5 points per document.

Zero

Sentences are difficult to understand. The tone and word choice are problematic. There may be little or no evidence of proofreading or attention to MLA formatting conventions.
Passing

Sentences are structurally problematic and the tone is inconsistent. The reflection essay demonstrates difficulty with sentence fragments, comma splices, run on sentences, or other distracting features in usage, punctuation, or capitalization. MLA formatting errors are common.
Good

Reflection essay uses sentence structures and vocabulary that express ideas in an understandable manner. Reflection essay fits some MLA formatting conventions for a final writing portfolio, with an appropriate tone and some proofreading errors or grammatical issues.
Very Good

Reflection essay uses sentence structures and course vocabulary to express ideas well. Reflection essay fits most MLA formatting conventions for a final writing portfolio, with an appropriate tone and few proofreading errors.
Excellent

Reflection essay demonstrates excellent use of sentence structures and cites specific course vocabulary to clearly express ideas. Reflection essay fits all MLA formatting conventions for a final writing portfolio, with an appropriate tone and no proofreading errors. It is clear that there is significant attention paid to small details and citing all sources correctly.
Completeness of Documented Revision
  Zero

0 pts

Passing

16.25 pts

Good

18.75 pts

Very Good

21.25 pts

Excellent

25 pts

Completeness of Documented Revision

1-25

Zero

Revision not complete or well documented enough to meet expectations.
Passing

All revised elements can be read and found.
Good

Revisions are documented and generally readable. The original writing has been revised in a manner that meets all expectations.
Very Good

Revisions are comprehensive and effectively organized. The writer's original argument is strengthened overall. The original writing has been revised to clearly define a feasible target audience. All main criticisms from interested readers are addressed in the revision.
Excellent

Revisions are exceptionally well-organized, documented, thorough, and easy to read. The writer's original argument is expanded and strengthened to be more engaging and compelling. The original submission has been thoroughly revised in a manner that distinguishes the writer and defines the target audience effectively.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202