Skip to main content
iRubric: Spring 2020 EM Application Assignment rubric

iRubric: Spring 2020 EM Application Assignment rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Spring 2020 EM Application Assignment 
Rubric Code: C2XX2BC
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Spring 20 EM Application Assignment
  Exceeds

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Developing

2 pts

Novice

1 pts

Stakeholder Participants (2x)
8 pts

REPA 5.8 - developing family and community partnerships that increase access to resources (e.g., classroom volunteers, funds, equipment), as long as they clearly align with & do not distract from the school’s goals for student growth and achievement

NELP Components 3.2, 5.1, and 5.2

Exceeds

The Remick Leader provides a detailed description of the stakeholders at the session and fulfills the guidelines for stakeholder representation.
Proficient

The Remick Leader provides a description of the stakeholders at the session and meets the guidelines for stakeholder representation.
Developing

The Remick Leader provides a limited description of the stakeholders at the session and/or somewhat meets the guidelines for stakeholder representation.
Novice

The Remick Leader provides an insufficient description of the stakeholders at the session and/or does not meet the guidelines for stakeholder representation.
Strategic Priorities (2x)
8 pts

REPA 2.1 - cultivating commitment to and ownership of the school's instructional vision, mission, values, and organizational goals, and ensuring that all key decisions are aligned to the vision

NELP Component 1.1

Exceeds

The Remick Leader provides a comprehensive analysis of the common themes that surfaced in the session, articulating high level, strategic priorities for the school, and demonstrating a clear effort to consider the broad level, big picture view of the school
Proficient

The Remick Leader provides an analysis of the common themes that surfaced in the session, articulating strategic priorities for the school, and demonstrating an effort to consider a broad view of the school.
Developing

The Remick Leader provides a limited analysis of common themes, and/or articulates narrow priorities for the school, and/or struggles to demonstrate a broad view of the school.
Novice

The Remick Leader provides a limited analysis of the session, failing to cite common themes and articulating narrow priorities for and an individual- specific view of the school.
Reflection (2x)
8 pts

REPA 3.5 - using reflection, self-awareness, ongoing learning, and resiliency to increase effectiveness in leading school improvement efforts

NELP Components 2.1 and 7.3

Exceeds

The Remick Leader provides a compelling personal reflection of the experience, demonstrating self-awareness, humility, and an ongoing desire to learn how to effectively engage in the strategic planning process.
Proficient

The Remick Leader provides a personal reflection of the experience, demonstrating self-awareness, humility, and an ongoing desire to learn how to effectively engage in the strategic planning process.
Developing

The Remick Leader provides a limited personal reflection of the experience that may not show self-awareness or a consideration of effectively engaging in the strategic planning process.
Novice

The Remick Leader struggles to provide a personal reflection of the experience.
Writing Quality (1x)
4 pts

REPA 3.1 - modeling professional, ethical, and respectful behavior at all times and expecting the same behavior from others

NELP Component 2.3

Exceeds

The Remick Leader displays academic professionalism with a high degree of clarity and efficiency; there are few to no errors in citations, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Proficient

The Remick Leader displays some academic professionalism with writing that is mostly clear and efficient; there are several errors in citations, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Developing

The Remick Leader displays limited academic professionalism with writing that may be wordy or unclear; there may be many errors in citations, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.
Novice

The Remick leader struggles to model academic professionalism with significant errors in citations, efficiency, clarity, mechanics, grammar, tone, and readability.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178