Skip to main content

iRubric: Oral Defense of PDSA rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Oral Defense of PDSA 
Rubric Code: B2XB332
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Oral Defense of PDSA
  Does Not Meet

1 pts

Approaches

2 pts

Meets

3 pts

Exceeds

4 pts

Problem Statement and Causal Analysis (NELP 1.2, REPA 4.3)

Does Not Meet

Does not include a clear statement of the problem or root causes.  Problem is not adequately evidenced.  Minimal or no varied sources of data are included to substantiate the need.

Lacks an adequate articulation of the gap between current reality and school mission/root beliefs.
Approaches

Includes a statement of the problem and limited root cause analysis. Problem is not adequately evidenced.  Few sources of data are included.

Lacks an adequate articulation of the gap between current reality and school mission/root beliefs.
Meets

Includes a concise statement of the problem and an adequate set of root causes.  Problem is adequately evidenced.  Several sources of data are included to substantiate the need.


Provides an adequate articulation of the gap between current reality and school mission/root beliefs.
Exceeds

Includes a concise statement of the problem and a comprehensive set of root causes.  Problem is well-evidenced.  Varied sources of data are included to substantiate the need.

Provides a compelling articulation of the gap between current reality and school mission/root beliefs.
Working Theory of Improvement (NELP 1.2, REPA 4.3)

Does Not Meet

Includes a limited theory of improvement. The identified drivers do not reflect the key areas of focus for the aim. Integrates few sources of relevant information/ research.
Approaches

A developing theory of improvement is detailed. The identified drivers are not sufficient to meet the aim. Integrates limited sources of relevant information/ research.
Meets

A theory of improvement is detailed with a measurable aim statement, at least two drivers and associated change ideas that will likely lead to the aim. Identified drivers are mostly aligned to the causal analysis and driven by few sources of relevant information/ research.
Exceeds

A theory of improvement is detailed with a measurable aim statement, at least two drivers and associated change ideas that will likely lead to the aim. Identified drivers are aligned to the causal analysis and driven by sources of relevant and high quality information/ research.
Change Idea and Measurement (NELP 1.2, REPA 4.3)

Does Not Meet

Does not provide justification for the change idea chosen for the PDSA cycle. Articulated measures (leading and process) are not sufficient to measure impact and inform improvement.
Approaches

Provides a partial justification for the change idea chosen for the PDSA cycle. Articulates only a limited set of measures. It is not clear that adequate data will be collected to measure impact and inform improvement.
Meets

Provides a justification for the change idea chosen for the PDSA cycle. Articulates a set of measures, including leading and process, that will likely capture adequate data to measure impact and inform improvement.
Exceeds

Provides a justification for the change idea chosen for the PDSA cycle. Articulates a
a comprehensive set of measures, including leading and process, that will capture ample data to measure impact and inform improvement.
Key Learnings and Next Steps (NELP 2.1, REPA 3.5)

Does Not Meet

Key learnings are not presented. Does not articulate next steps or the steps are not aligned to key learning.
Approaches

Did not utilize relevant data to explain findings. Articulates limited next steps which may not be logically aligned to key learning.
Meets

Utilizes some relevant process, driver, and/or leading data to explain any findings. Articulates next steps that are logically aligned to key learning.
Exceeds

Utilizes relevant process, driver, and/or leading data to explain any findings. Articulates a compelling set of next steps that are logically aligned to key learning.
Slide Design and Presentation Quality (NELP 5.3, REPA 4.2)

Does Not Meet

Overall, the slides include
too much or unrelated
verbal and visual
information, interfering
with the audience
member’s ability to
understand the key points
of the presentation. Does not adequately respond to questions.
Approaches

Many slides include too
much or unrelated verbal
and visual information,
interfering with the
audience member’s ability to understand the key points of the presentation. Responses to questions are minimal or may not reflect learning in the course.
Meets

Most slides include an appropriate amount of verbal and visual information, strategically chosen to help the audience member understand the key points of the presentation. Responds to questions thoughtfully.
Exceeds

The slides include an
appropriate amount of verbal and visual information, strategically chosen to help the audience member understand the key points of the presentation. Responds to questions confidently and thoughtfully.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202